Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 1;9:23779608231207227. doi: 10.1177/23779608231207227

Table 3.

Subgroup-Analysis of Influencing Factors of Nurses’ Alarm Fatigue.

Subgroup analysis Inclusion study Number Heterogeneity test Effect model Alarm fatigue score
Combined effect value (95% CI)
I2 (95%) p
Night shift Yes 3 (Wang, 2017; Wang, 2018c; Yang, 2021) 356 95.7 p ≤ .001 Random 21.07 (18.78, 23.37)
No 3 (Wang, 2017; Wang, 2018c; Yang, 2021) 49 90.1 p ≤ .001 Random 19.89 (16.26, 23.51)
Professional title Nurse 3 (Wang, 2018a; Wang, 2018c; Yin, 2018) 405 93.2 p ≤ .001 Random 19.50 (16.56, 22.44)
Nurse practitioner 3 (Wang, 2018a; Wang, 2018c; Yin, 2018) 511 98.0 p ≤ .001 Random 20.02 (16.89, 23.16)
Supervisor nurse 3 (Wang, 2018a; Wang, 2018c; Yin, 2018) 139 95.2 p ≤ .001 Random 18.40 (14.61, 22.18)
Deputy chief nurse and above 3 (Wang, 2018a; Wang, 2018c; Yin, 2018) 16 74.9 p ≤ .001 Random 15.43 (11.52, 19.35)