Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2016 Jun 22;49:28–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.004

Table 7.

Announcement and implementation effects for pharmaceutical prices by Medicare market share.

Dependent variable: Price
Log(price)
(1) (2)

MMS*Year2001 −1.2987 −0.1006
(10.673) (0.134)
MMS*Year2002 5.5946 −0.0473
(10.021) (0.118)
MMS*Year2003 −4.5142 −0.1458
(10.656) (0.115)
MMS*Year2004 −4.4471 −0.1957*
(10.376) (0.119)
MMS*Year2005 −1.2343 −0.1451
(10.988) (0.117)
MMS*Year2006 −16.3658 −0.2405*
(11.754) (0.123)
(MMS*2004-MMS*2003) – (MMS*2002-MMS*2001) −6.8262 −0.1033
(10.349) (0.142)
(MMS*2005-MMS*2003) – (MMS*2003-MMS*2001) 6.4955 0.0458
(14.005) (0.161)
(MMS*2006-MMS*2005) – (MMS*2002-MMS*2001) −22.0248* −0.1488
(12.032) (0.147)
Weighted by #Rx 02–03 Y Y
Year fixed effects Y Y
Drug fixed effects Y Y
Observations 924 924

Notes:

***

p < 0.01

**

p < 0.05

*

p < 0.1.

Robust standard errors in parentheses. This regression is estimated at the drug-year level from Equation 3. The MMS is the fraction of prescriptions that are purchased by Medicare beneficiaries for each drug in the 2002–2003 pooled MEPS. The bottom panel presents linear combinations of the coefficients and their standard errors. MEPS 2000–2006.