Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 10;55(9):591–597. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.996183

Table 1. Aggregate Values for the Frequency, Corresponding Significance Level, and Magnitude of Effect for Intention (T2) and Practice (T3) of Cohorts 2015 and 2016*.

Domains/settings/populations

T2, n (%)

T3, n (%)

χ2

P value

Effect size, phi

Care across the life cycle

1,248 (96.1%)

458 (88.4%)

38.888

<.001

0.146335

Intrapartum care

544 (43.9%)

161 (31.1%)

25.009

<.001

0.119307

Mental health care

1,188 (94.5%)

467 (90.0%)

11.873

<.001

0.081763

Chronic disease management

1,273 (97.4%)

467 (90.2%)

43.841

<.001

0.154992

Palliative/end-of-life care

902 (79.9%)

336 (64.9%)

42.966

<.001

0.161516

Office-based clinical procedures

1,164 (94.4%)

410 (79.2%)

93.396

<.001

0.230952

In-hospital clinical procedures

569 (46.8%)

194 (37.5%)

12.863

<.001

0.08613

Practice setting: emergency departments

620 (49.9%)

175 (33.8%)

38.250

<.001

0.147378

Practice setting: in hospital

815 (72.5%)

300 (57.8%)

35.206

<.001

0.146383

Practice setting: care in the home

581 (52.8%)

221 (42.6%)

14.781

<.001

0.095549

Practice setting: long-term care facilities

544 (48.2%)

145 (28.0%)

59.496

<.001

0.190063

Marginalized, disadvantaged, and vulnerable populations

724 (68.5%)

333 (64.2%)

2.960

.085

0.043339

Rural communities

766 (67.7%)

221 (42.7%)

92.436

<.001

0.236689

Elderly populations

1229 (95.1%)

441 (85.0%)

52.092

<.001

0.169553

Indigenous populations

569 (55.1%)

208 (40.2%)

30.962

<.001

0.141336

*Results include responses of “highly likely” and “somewhat likely” (T2), and “Yes” (T3).