Table 2.

Negative sites for Cryptosporidium detection.

Site and/or region	Country	Period	Sample	Methods	Pos. samples/Neg. samples	References	Map ID
Sitio Antoniao, Piaui	Brazil	9,670 ± 140 BP	Rodent coprolite	ELISA	0/1	Leles et al. (2019)	17
Toca do Morcego, Bahia	Brazil	9,200 BP	Feline coprolite	ELISA	0/1	Leles et al. (2019)	18
Sitio do Meio, Piaui	Brazil	9,150 ± 60 BP	Feline coprolite	ELISA	0/1	Leles et al. (2019)	19
Toca dos Coqueiros, Piaui	Brazil	8,870 ± 60 BP	Canid, Feline and Human coprolites	ELISA	0/5	Leles et al. (2019)	20
Furna do Estrago, Pernambuco	Brazil	4,000–5,000 BP	Human coprolite	ELISA	0/2	Leles et al. (2019)	21
Jerusalem	Israel	2,700–2,500 BP	Latrine sediment	ELISA	0/4	Mitchell et al. (2023)	22
Toca de Cima dos Piloes, Piaui	Brazil	2,290 ± 60 BP	Rodent coprolite	ELISA	0/1	Leles et al. (2019)	23
Vacone	Italy	Roman Imperial-period	Drain fill sediment	ELISA	0/2	Ledger et al. (2021)	24
Vagnari	Italy	Roman Imperial-period	Drain fill sediment	ELISA	0/3	Ledger et al. (2021)	25
Chevenez	Switzerland	7th–9th c. CE	Human sediment	IFA/Immunochromatography	0/2	Le Bailly (2005)	26
Pineuilh	France	10th c. CE	Sediment	IFA/Immunochromatography	0/1	Le Bailly (2005)	27
City of Acre	Israel	12th–13th c. CE	Latrine sediment	ELISA	0/24	Mitchell et al. (2008)	28
Jerusalem	Israel	15th c. CE	Cesspool sediment and coprolites	ELISA	0/1 sediment & 0/8 coprolites	Yeh et al. (2015)	29
Brussels	Belgium	14th–17th c. CE	Latrine sediment	ELISA	0/7	Graff et al. (2020)	30
Sepulcher of the Priests of the Piraino Mother Church, Messina, Sicily	Italy	18th–19th c. CE	Intestinal content	ELISA / PCR-Sanger	0/1	Rollins et al. (2021)	31