Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 2;6:100213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100213

Table 1.

Composition and Characterization of the prepared RSV-loaded Silica Nanoparticles.

Formulation
code
, , ⁎⁎Composition
Characterization
⁎⁎Hydroalcoholic solution
(v/v)
Nitrogen source (%w/v)
Silica source (%v/v)
Drug (%w/v)
PS PDI ZP %DC
Aqueous phase Alcoholic phase Ch. HCl TEOS RSV
RSNP1 1 1 0.1 10 0.2 342.90±34.60 0.59±0.07 11.70±0.10 94.91±1.29
RSNP2 1 1 0.1 20 0.2 221.00±7.30 0.39±0.02 12.90±2.80 100.22±0.67
RSNP3 2 1 0.1 10 0.2 496.25±1.85 0.63±0.15 9.97±2.23 89.82±0.22
RSNP4 2 1 0.1 20 0.2 362.35±54.05 0.47±0.05 10.85±0.75 99.16±0.62
RSNP5 3 1 0.1 10 0.2 1707.50±111.50 0.55±0.26 7.41±1.98 85.35±1.68
RSNP6 3 1 0.1 20 0.2 1374.50±72.50 0.56±0.33 9.65±3.06 91.67±2.18

Abbreviations: RSNP, Rosuvastatin entrapped silica nanoparticles; TEOS, Tetraethyl orthosilicate; RSV, Rosuvastatin; PS, Particle size; PDI, Polydispersity index; ZP, Zeta potential; %DC, % drug content.

Chitosan hydrochloride was dissolved in water (aqueous phase) while RSV was dissolved in propylene glycol (alcoholic phase). Following, the alcoholic solution was added to aqueous solution on stirring. TEOS was added dropwise to the hydroalcoholic solution.

All concentrations were relevant to the final volume.

⁎⁎

Aqueous and alcoholic phases were mixed as volume ratios.