Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 28;36(11):1619–1631. doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0206

Table 1.

The effects of dietary fiber on the fecal and gut microbiota of gestating sows1)

Main source Inclusion rate (%) Fiber composition in diet2) (%) Feed allowance3) (kg/d) Feeding length Microbial diversity Changing relative abundance References



Control Treatment Control Treatment Phylum level Another taxon



SDF IDF SDF IDF
Konjac flour 2.20 2.30 18.16 4.00 45.93 2.42 2.41 Gestating period - - - [19]5)
Guar gum plus Pregelatinized waxy maize starch 2.00 Not provided Not provided 2.42 Gestating period F:B4)(↑) [35]
Stevia residue 20.0 Not provided Not provided 2.76 3.70 Gestating period F:B (↑) [92]6)
30.0
40.0
Wheat bran 18.0 1.57 10.91 2.02 15.33 2.40 2.56 Gestating period × F:B (↓) [93]6)
Wheat bran and fiber mix 16.4 / 1.0 2.16 15.56
(Wheat bran / fiber) 14.8 / 2.0 2.29 15.79
13.2 / 3.0 2.42 16.01
11.6 / 4.0 2.56 16.24
Inulin 1.60 Not provided Not provided 3.30 d 80 of gestation to farrowing × F:B (↓) [36]
Alfalfa meal 10.0 2.12 15.9 2.23 22.74 Recommendations of NRC (2012) d 60 of gestation to farrowing × × [37]5)
Wheat bran 30.0 1.39 9.98 1.86 19.95 3.00 3.31 d 80 of gestation to weaning × × [62]6),7)
Sugar beet pulp 20.0 4.06 17.54 3.07 ×
Fine wheat bran 20.0 2.20 18.28 2.79 17.55 2.51 Gestating period F:B (↓) [48]
Inulin 0.83 0 0 0.83 20.00 2.40 2.90 Insemination to d 106 of gestation × F:B (↓) [90]
Cellulose 20.0
Lignocellulose 1.50 2.18 17.31 2.10 18.00 3.00 3.03 d 85 of gestation to farrowing × × [18]5),6)
Resistant starch 2.00 4.10 16.50 3.04 ×
Konjac flour 2.00 2.17 14.84 3.04 F:B (↓)
1)

A circle sign (○) represents significant difference at p<0.05, a multiplication sign (×) represents no difference at p>0.05, an up-arrow sign (↑) and down arrow sign (↓) represents significant increase and decrease at p<0.05, respectively.

2)

SDF, soluble dietary fiber; IDF, insoluble dietary fiber; IDF:SDF, insoluble dietary fiber to soluble dietary fiber ratio.

3)

Weighted average value based on feeding length during gestating period.

4)

F:B, Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio.

5)

The fiber composition in diet was calculated value based on previous study [9,12,19,76].

6)

The control and treatment groups were adjusted to have similar metabolizable or digestible energy intake through different feed intake.

7)

Dietary fiber composition of lactation diet; the control, wheat bran, and sugar beet pulp diets contained 11.8%, 16.8%, and 16.9% total dietary fiber, 1.43%, 2.72%, and 1.70% soluble dietary fiber, and 10.4%, 14.1%, and 15.2% insoluble dietary fiber, respectively.