Table 7. Individual studies evaluating HR between meat consumption and diabetes.
Study | Total sample | Total Diabetes cases | Follow-up (years) | HR | HR 95% CI - Lower | HR 95% CI - Upper | Weight in meta-analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Pan et al., 2013 217 | 149,143 | 7,540 | 16-20 | 1.99 | 1.53 | 2.58 | 46.38 |
2. Pan et al., 2011 216 | 204,157 | 13,759 | - | 1.12 | 1.08 | 1.16 | 53.62 |
Total | 353,300 | 21,299 | |||||
Meta analyses | |||||||
3. Aune, Ursin & Veierod, 2009 218 | 1.17 | 0.92 | 1.48 | ||||
4. Micha et al., 2011 219 | 1,218,380 | 10,797 | - | 1.16 | 0.92 | 1.46 | - |
Note: HR was calculated for meat-consumption vs. non-meat-consumption.