Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 20;71(43):16270–16285. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04515

Table 2. Concentration of Markers of Glycoxidative Stress (Means ± Standard Deviation) in the Tissues from Each Compartment of the Gastrointestinal Tract from Wistar Rats (n = 6 Per Group) Fed Ad Libitum for 10 Weeks with a Control Base Diet and either Drinking Water (Control) or a 30% Fructose Water Solution (Fructose).

    α-AS1 γ-GS2 total PPC3 APOPs4 TBARS5
stomach control 0.38e ± 0.09 0.22c ± 0.02 0.61d ± 0.14 350f ± 22 0.26b ± 0.06
fructose 0.69d ± 0.12 0.46b ± 0.05 1.15c ± 0.22 506d ± 31 0.29b ± 0.04
jejunum control 1.29c ± 0.16 0.50a ± 0.07 1.80b ± 0.25 439e ± 30 0.38a ± 0.06
fructose 1.38c ± 0.19 0.56a ± 0.06 1.95b ± 0.31 627c ± 44 0.41a ± 0.09
colon control 1.99b ± 0.25 0.12d ± 0.03 2.03b ± 0.29 840b ± 87 0.36ab ± 0.07
fructose 2.45a ± 0.29 0.15d ± 0.04 2.61a ± 0.32 1203a ± 99 0.41a ± 0.11
p-value6 stage *** *** ** *** *
diet *** ** ** *** ns
S × D * ** * ns ns
1

α-Aminoadipic semialdehyde. Results are expressed as nmol carbonyl/mg protein.

2

γ-Glutamic semialdehyde. Results are expressed as nmol carbonyl/mg protein.

3

Total primary protein carbonyls. Results are expressed as nmol carbonyl/mg of protein.

4

Advanced protein oxidation products. Results are expressed as arbitrary fluorescent units.

5

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. Results are expressed as mg MDA/100 g sample (feed, digests, feces).

6

Significance level in two-way ANOVA with the effects of the stage (S) (feed, GIT compartments, feces), diet (D) (control vs fructose), and the interaction (S × D).

Means with different letters within the same column were significantly different in Tukey post hoc analysis (p < 0.05). ns: no significance, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.