Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 23;35:1533317520918719. doi: 10.1177/1533317520918719

Table 6.

Transition Intensities and Determinants of AD Stage Changes Using Functional and Cognitive Instruments Among the ADMDC Probable AD Cohort, Houston, Texas, 1990 to 2011.

Transition Intensity/Transition Ratioa 95% CI
MMSE (n = 972)
 Base (transition intensity)
   expβ^012 0.97 0.44-2.15
   expβ^021 0.05 0.02-0.14
   expβ^023 0.71 0.32-1.57
Transition ratio
  Gender 1.08 0.92-1.28
  Age, years 0.98 0.97-0.99
  Education, years 1.01 0.98-1.03
  Pre-progression 1.07 1.04-1.11
CDR-SB (n = 982)
Base transition intensity
   expβ^012 0.34 0.15-0.74
   expβ^021 0.03 0.01-0.08
   expβ^023 0.24 0.11-0.54
Transition ratio
  Gender 1.13 0.96-1.34
  Age, years 0.99 0.98-1.00
  Education, years 1.00 0.98-1.02
  Pre-progression 1.08 1.05-1.11
ADAS-Cog (n = 847)
 Base transition intensity
   expβ^012 0.24 0.03-1.80
   expβ^021 0.00 0.00-0.02
   expβ^023 0.01 0.00-0.07
Transition intensity
  Gender 1.05 0.73-1.51
  Age, years 0.99 0.97-1.02
  Education, years 1.03 0.97-1.09
  Pre-progression 1.08 0.99-1.18

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADAS-Cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive; ADMDC, Alzheimer’s Disease and Memory Disorders Center; CDR-SB, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale–Sum of Boxes; CI, confidence interval; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination.

a Note that eβ^r=1/eβ^r is the multiplicative impact on mean duration. Transition ratio interpreted for gender as rate of transition for males relative to females. For other variables, the estimated ratio corresponds to a 1-unit incremental change.