Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Mar;146(3):428–441. doi: 10.1037/xge0000275

Table 1.

Preference for conformity coding categories.

Category Forced choice selection Explanation Examples of explanations
High conformity High conformity child Participant provided explanation for selecting high conformity child that was consistent with forced choice selection. Often these explanations mentioned the child’s conformity or provided normative reasoning. “She was able to completely duplicate the adult’s actions.”
“Watched the teacher and made the same.”

Low conformity Low conformity child Participant provided explanation for selecting low conformity child that was consistent with forced choice selection. Often these explanations mentioned the child’s deviation from the adult’s demonstration. “[She] shows thinking on her own and outside of the box, not doing what everyone else does.”
“She used all of the beads.”

No preference Either child Participant indicated that they would like to select both children, that both children are smart/well-behaved, or that they could not evaluate who fit the trait based on the task. “They are both smart.”
“Both children sat quietly and completed the task.”
“This task is not an assessment of intelligence.”