Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;39:100820. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100820

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a. Spatial–temporal cluster of elevated overall suicide risk by location of residence in Hong Kong, 2014/1–2018/12. Note: The location of identified spatial–temporal cluster with elevated overall suicide risk by location of residence is highlighted in grey. b. Spatial–temporal cluster of elevated jumping suicide risk by location of residence in Hong Kong, 2014/1–2018/12. Note: The location of identified spatial–temporal cluster with elevated jumping suicide risk by location of residence is highlighted in grey. c. Spatial–temporal cluster of elevated charcoal burning suicide risk by location of residence in Hong Kong, 2014/1–2018/12. Note: The location of identified spatial–temporal cluster with elevated charcoal burning suicide risk by location of residence is highlighted in grey. d. Spatial–temporal clusters of elevated overall suicide risk by location of incidence in Hong Kong, 2014/1–2018/12. Note: The locations of identified spatial–temporal cluster with elevated overall suicide risk by location of incidence are highlighted in grey. The clusters are numbered with reference to the numbering shown in Table 1 e. Spatial–temporal clusters of elevated jumping suicide risk by location of incidence in Hong Kong, 2014/1–2018/12. Note: The locations of identified spatial–temporal cluster with elevated jumping suicide risk by location of incidence are highlighted in grey. The clusters are numbered with reference to the numbering shown in Table 1 f. Spatial–temporal clusters of elevated charcoal burning suicide risk by location of incidence in Hong Kong, 2014/1–2018/12. Note: The locations of identified spatial–temporal cluster with elevated charcoal burning suicide risk by location of incidence are highlighted in grey. The clusters are numbered with reference to the numbering shown in Table 1.