Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;39:100820. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100820

Table 1.

Information of suicide clusters in Hong Kong, 2014/1–2018/12.

Cluster Time STPU(s) in cluster Number of cases Population Relative risk p-value
Location of residence
Overall (N = 4388)
 1 2016/08–2018/11 247, 280, 281, 283, 284, 286, 287, 288, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295 344 821,014 1.47 0.001
Jumping (N = 2315)
 1 2016/02–2018/04 280, 281, 283, 284, 286, 287, 288, 291 140 515,538 1.89 0.001
Charcoal burning (N = 564)
 1 2016/12–2018/04 515, 517, 518, 519, 522, 523, 524, 527, 529 20 208,396 4.34 0.03
Location of incidence
Overall (N = 4362)
 1 2014/02–2016/03 121 13 1720 28.17 0.001
 2 2015/10–2017/11 132, 133, 134, 135, 146 35 44,608 2.92 0.03
 3 2016/08–2018/11 247, 280, 281, 283, 284, 286, 287, 288, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295 342 821,014 1.47 0.001
Jumping (N = 2356)
 1 2014/02–2016/03 121 9 1720 36.14 0.001
 2 2016/09–2018/11 280, 281, 283, 284, 286, 287, 288, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295 211 814,117 1.79 0.001
Charcoal burning (N = 574)
 1 2014/10–2016/02 220, 221, 222, 227, 228, 229, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 266, 267, 268 26 323,838 3.58 0.028
 2 2016/10–2017/06 920 7 20,361 28.43 0.003

Bold and italic indicate that the p-value is statistically significant (i.e., p < 0.05).