Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chest Med. 2023 Sep 21;44(4):675–721. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2023.08.012

Table 2:

Studies of Rates of Pulmonary NTM Isolation and Disease by Region

North America
Location (dates) Case Definition Data Source/Cohort Annual Prevalence (per 100,000 population) Period Prevalence Incidence (per 100,000 population)
Isolation (dates) Disease (dates) Period Duration (years) Prevalence (per 100,000 population)
Canada
Ontario, Canada (1998–2010)131 Isolation: ≥ 1 isolate
Disease: ATS microbiologic criteria
Public Health Ontario Laboratory Database 11.4–22.2 (1998–2010) (APC: 6.3%); Annual Change (MAC: 0.291, M. xenopi: 0.059, M. abscessus: 0.019) 4.65 – 9.08 (1998–2010) (APC: 8.0%)+** - - -
United States
U.S. (2008–2015)45 ICD-9/ICD-10 Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Care Claims database - 6.78–11.70 (APC: 7.5%) (2008–2015) 8 - 3.13–4.73 (2008–2015) (APC: 5.2%) (D)
Florida (2012–2018)55 ICD-9-CM/ICD-10 OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium database - 14.3–22.6 (2012–2018) 7 - 6.5–5.4 (2012–2018) (D)
Hawaii (2005–2013)52 Isolation: ≥ 1 isolate
Disease: ATS microbiologic criteria
Kaiser Permanente Hawaii databases 20–44 (2005–2013) (APC: 6%)** 9–19 (2005–2013)+** 9 Range by Ethnic group: 50–300 (I)** -
Hawaii (2005–2019)53 ≥ 1 isolate Kaiser Permanente Hawaii EHR databases - - 15 - Overall Annualized: 44.8 (I)**, Range by Ethnic group: 17–63 (I)**, Cumulative: 247 (I)**
Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Wisconsin (2008–2013)51 ≥ 1 isolate Surveillance data from Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Wisconsin Overall: 8.7–13.9 (2008–2013)§# (APC: 9.9%)§#, Maryland: 9.5–9.29 (2008–2013)§# Mississippi:10.2–13.69 (2008–2013)§#, Missouri: 5.5–13.39 (2008–2013)§#, Ohio: 5.8–11.39 (2008–2013)§#, Wisconsin: 15.4–24.69 (2008–2013)§# - - - -
North Carolina (2006–2010)58 ≥ 1 isolate All labs that test for NTM in 3 counties (hospital, commercial, public health) Overall: 9.4** - - - -
North Carolina (2006–2010)38 ≥ 1 isolate All labs that test for NTM in 3 counties (hospital, commercial, publica health - - 5 - Cumulative: 8.8 (I)
Oregon (2007–2012)10 ATS microbiologic criteria All laboratories that test for NTM in Oregon - 5.9 (2011–2012)+ 6 - 5.0 (APC: 2.2%) (D)+; 3.8 (D)§+
U.S.–Affiliated Pacific Island Jurisdictions (2007–2011)54 ≥ 1 isolate Diagnostic Laboratory Services data 2–48 (2007–2011) (adjusted rate ratio 1.65) - 4 Overall: 106 (I); American Samoa (22) (I), Federated States of Micronesia (164) (I) -
Central and South America
Location (dates) Case Definition Data Source/Cohort Annual Prevalence (per 100,000 population) Period Prevalence Incidence (per 100,000 population)
Isolation (dates) Disease (dates) Period Duration (years) Prevalence (per 100,000 population)
French Guiana (2008–2018)61 Isolation: ≥ 1 isolate
Disease: Full ATS criteria
Three general hospitals EHR data - - 11 - 6.17 (I); 1.07 (D)
Mexico City, Mexico (2001–2017)62 Full ATS criteria Tertiary care referral medical center EHR data - - 17 - SGM: 0.6/1000 admissions (2001–2011)–1.9 (2012–2017) (D)#; RGM: 0.3/1000 (2001–2011)−1.1/1000 (2012–2017) (D)#
Uruguay (2006–2018)67 ≥ 1 isolate National tuberculosis reference laboratory EHR data 0.33 – 1.57 (2006–2018) (4.79-fold increase)# - - - -
Europe
Location (dates) Case Definition Data Source/Cohort Annual Prevalence (per 100,000 population) Period Prevalence Incidence (per 100,000 population)
Isolation (dates) Disease (dates) Period Duration (years) Prevalence (per 100,000 population)
Czech Republic (2012–2018)81 Full ATS criteria Public Health Institute Ostrava database for Moravian and Silesian Regions - - 7 - 1.1 (D)#
Denmark (1991–2015)68 Isolation: ≥ 1 isolate
Disease: Modified ATS microbiologic criteria
International Reference Laboratory data - - 25 - 2.14 (I); Definite and Possible NTM-PD: 1.10 (D)+#
England, Wales and Northern Ireland (January 2007–July 2012)77 ≥ 1 isolate Public Health England database - - 6 - 3.4–5.0 (2007–2012) (I)**
France (2010–2017)69 ICD-10 or suggestive medication National Health System database - - 8 5.92 (D) 1.025–1.096 (2010–2017) (D)
Germany (2009–2014)72 ICD-10 Health Risk Institute health services research database - 2.3–3.3 (2009–2014)§ - - -
Germany (2010–2011)26 ICD-10 German statutory health insurances claims database - - 2 - 1.12–1.48 (2010–2011) (D); Cumulative: 2.6 (D)
Germany (2011–2016)71 ICD-10 (German modification) InGef research database of statutory health insurances claims - ICD-10 coded: 3.79§; Predicted: 19.05§ 5 - ICD-10 coded: 1.56 (D)§; Predicted: 15.33 (D)§
Greece (January 2007 - May 2013)84 Isolation: ≥ 1 isolate
Disease: Full (12 pts) ATS criteria and ATS microbiologic criteria (56 pts)
Sismanoglio-A. Fleming General Hospital of Attiki EHR data - - 7 - Cumulative:18.9 (I); Cumulative: 8.8 (D)++
Portugal (2002–2012)73 Treatment for NTM-PD National Tuberculosis Surveillance System database - - 11 - 0.54 (D)#
Scotland (2000–2010)86 ATS microbiologic criteria Scottish Mycobacteria Reference Laboratory data - - 11 - 2.43 (D)+**#
Serbia (2010–2015)74 Isolation: 1 isolate
Disease: ATS microbiologic criteria
The National Reference Laboratory of Serbia database - 0.31 (2011–2012)–0.47 (2014–2015)+** 6 - 1.3 (I); 0.29 (D)+**
Spain (1994 –2014)75 Isolation: ≥ 1 isolate
Disease: ≥2 positive cultures or antimicrobial chemotherapy
Referral Hospital (Bellvitge University Hospital) Laboratory data - - 21 113.2 (I)**; 42.8 (D)+++ ** -
Spain (1994–2015)76 Isolation: ≥ 1 isolate
Disease: Full ATS criteria (only RGM)
Referral Hospital (Bellvitge University Hospital) Laboratory data - - 22 - 0.34–1.73 (2003–2015) (APC: 8.3%) (I)#
Spain (1997–2016)78 Full ATS criteria Microbiology Laboratory of Cruces University Hospital data - - 20 - 10.6–1.8 (2016) (APC: 3.3% (MAC), −6.5% (M. kansasii)) (D)
The United Kingdom (2006–2016)79 ‘Strict Cohort’, highly likely to have NTM-PD; ‘Expanded Cohort’ possible NTM-PD++++ Clinical Practice Research Datalink - Strict Cohort: 7.68–4.70 (2006–2016)# 10 Strict Cohort: 6.38 (D)# Strict Cohort: 3.85–1.28 (2006–2016) (D)#; Expanded Cohort: 22.9–40.9 (2006–2016) (D)#
The Netherlands (2012–2019)70 Drug combination in drug dispensing database, ICD-10 IQVIA’s Real-World Data Longitudinal Prescription database, Outpatient Pharmacy Database of the PHARMO Database Network, IQVIA’s health insurance claims database, Hospitalization Database of the PHARMO Database Network - 2.3–5.9 (databases); 6.2–9.9 (pulmonologist survey) - - -
East Asia
Location (dates) Case Definition Data Source/Cohort Annual Prevalence (per 100,000 population) Period Prevalence Incidence (per 100,000 population)
Isolation (dates) Disease (dates) Period Duration (years) Prevalence (per 100,000 population)
Japan (2001–2009)132 Full ATS criteria Microbiological database of 11 hospitals in Nagasaki prefecture - - 9 - 4.6–10.1 (2001–2009) (D)
Japan (2004–2006)23 ICD-8–10, estimated from Death Statistics Vital Statistics of Japan database - 33–65 (2005)§ - - -
Japan (2009–2014) 107 ICD-10 The Japanese National Database of Health Insurance Claims - 29 (2011) 6 - 8.6 (2011) (D)
Japan (2012–2013)105 ATS microbiologic criteria 3 major laboratories (SRL, Inc., LSI Medience Corporation, BML, Inc.) - 12 (2012–2013)+** 2 24 (D)+** -
South Korea (2001–2015)104 Full ATS criteria NTM Registry of Tertiary Referral Hospital (Samsung Medical Center) - - 15 - 7.0–55.6 (2001–2015) (D)
South Korea (2003–2016)98 ICD-10 National Health Insurance Service database - 1.2–33.3§ 14 - 1.0–17.9 (2003–2019) (D)§
South Korea (2006–2016)100 Full ATS criteria Tertiary Referral Hospital (Severance Hospital) EHR data - - 11 - 4.6–19.6 (2006–2016) (I); 1.2–4.8 (2006–2016) (APC: 14%) (D)
South Korea (2007–2018)99 ICD-10 Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database - 5.3–41.7 12 - Diagnostic-based: 3.5–18.0 (2008–2018) (APC: 16.7%) (D); Clinically-refined: 2.9–12.3 (2008–2018) (APC: 13.2%) (D)
South Korea (2009–2015)133 ICD-10 Health Insurance Review and Assessment service database - - 7 - 6.6–26.6 (2009–2015) (D)
South Korea (2009–2015)103 Full ATS criteria Tertiary care Hospitals (Pusan National University, Pusan National University Yangsan) EHR data - - 7 - 6.8–12.9 (2009–2015) (D)#
Taiwan (2000–2012)115 Full ATS criteria Tertiary Medical Center (National Taiwan University) data - - - - 3.4–13 (D)
Taiwan (2003–2018)113 ICD-9-CM, treatment National Health Insurance Research database - 0.68–7.17# (Treatment Case) - - 0.54–3.35 (2003–2018) (D) (Treatment Case)#
Taiwan (2005–2013)112 ICD-9-CM, ≥ 2 cultures, treatment National Health Insurance Research database - - - - 5.3–14.8 (2005–2013) (D)§#
Taiwan (2007–2010)114 ≥ 1 isolate National TB Registry of Taiwan CDC - - - - 8.6 (I)
Taiwan (2010–2014)116 Full ATS criteria 6-Hospital EHR database - - - - 46 (D)
West and Central Asia
Location (dates) Case Definition Data Source/Cohort Annual Prevalence (per 100,000 population) Period Prevalence Incidence (per 100,000 population)
Isolation (dates) Disease (dates) Period Duration (years) Prevalence (per 100,000 population)
Iran (1990–2014)134 - - - - 25 9.6–10.6 (D)# -
Oceania
Location (dates) Case Definition Data Source/Cohort Annual Prevalence (per 100,000 population) Period Prevalence Incidence (per 100,000 population)
Isolation (dates) Disease (dates) Period Duration (years) Prevalence (per 100,000 population)
Australia (2001–2016)41 ≥ 1 isolate Queensland Notifiable Conditions database - - 16 - 11.1–25.88 (I)#
Australia (2012–2015)3 ≥ 1 isolate Queensland Notifiable Conditions database - - 4 - 25.9 (I)#
*

Rates expressed as annual rates per 100,000 population, averaged over study period unless otherwise specified

**

Studies which excluded M. gordonae

ICD-9 – International diagnostic classification of diseases – ninth revision

ICD-10 – International diagnostic classification of diseases – tenth revision

SGM – slow-growing mycobacteria

RGM – rapid-growing mycobacteria

EHR – electronic health records

APC – annual percent change

+

NTM-PD is defined using ATS microbiologic criteria

++

NTM-PD is defined using ATS microbiologic criteria and full ATS criteria

+++

NTM-PD is defined ≥2 positive cultures or antimicrobial chemotherapy

++++

‘Strict Cohort’ is defined using evidence of treatment and/or monitoring of NTM-PD and ‘expanded cohort’ is defined using NTM disease clinical terminology codes

#

Included patients with NTM isolated from extrapulmonary sites/specimens from extrapulmonary sites

§

Adjusted