Table 2.
Performance comparison between NRTPredictor and the other algorithms (Test dataset)
| Method | Feature selection | No. of features | Accuracy % | Precision % | Recall % | F1-measure % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lightgbm | F-score | 150 | 96.53 | 94.27 | 93.37 | 93.78 |
| XGBoost | F-score | 430 | 97.88 | 96.48 | 96.33 | 96.39 |
| SVM | F-score | 180 | 96.34 | 94.02 | 93.35 | 93.66 |
| RFC | F-score | 210 | 94.41 | 93.09 | 85.51 | 88.14 |
| Lightgbm | CV2 | 20,000 | 97.11 | 95.48 | 94.49 | 94.97 |
| XGBoost | CV2 | 20,000 | 97.59 | 96.27 | 95.56 | 95.89 |
| SVM | CV2 | 7000 | 94.22 | 93.45 | 89.92 | 91.27 |
| RFC | CV2 | 14,000 | 89.71 | 88.02 | 85.43 | 85.37 |
| Lightgbm | MIC | 100 | 95.49 | 94.49 | 93.70 | 94.02 |
| XGBoost | MIC | 100 | 96.59 | 94.80 | 94.56 | 94.61 |
| SVM | MIC | 110 | 96.72 | 95.15 | 94.84 | 94.92 |
| RFC | MIC | 120 | 93.55 | 91.18 | 81.17 | 85.18 |
| NRTPredictor | MIC | 110 | 98.01 | 95.63 | 95.45 | 95.95 |