Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 19;79(Pt 6):515–526. doi: 10.1107/S205327332300863X

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Timing comparison of methods. (a) Timing for sample ‘M’. (b) Timing for sample ‘T’. (c) Timing for sample ‘mammoth’. Note the logarithmic y axis. In all cases, SIGTT is the fastest method, followed by IR, with ZH being the slowest by a considerable margin.