Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 24;114(5):e2023040. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v114i5.15065

Supplementary Table 2.

Modified Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale

Case Control Studies
1. Selection of controls
a. From study base (2)
b. Not from study base (1)
c. Other, incl. ecological, no description (0)
2. Adjustment of confounders
a. Adjustment for most important potential confounders (2)
b. Adjustment for some potential confounders (1)
c. Adjustment for no confounders except age, gender, race/ethnicity, calendar period (0)
3. Ascertainment of exposure
a. Objective record (eg employment records, biomarkers) (2)
b. Structured interview blind to case/control status, GIS (1)
c. Interview not blinded to case/control status, self-report, proxy (e.g., residence) (0.5)
d. No description (0)
4. Response rate
a. Both groups over 90% (2)
b. One or both groups between 60- 90% (1)
c. One group under 60%, no description (0)
5. Latency
a. Adequate latency between exposure and outcome (>15 yrs) (2)
b. Limited latency between exposure and outcome (5-15 yrs) (1)
c. Inadequate latency between exposure and outcome (<5 yrs), no description (0)
6. Outcome
a. Cancer registration (2)
b. Death certificates, hospital records (1)
c. Self report (0.5)
d. No description (0)
Cohort Studies
1. Selection of unexposed cohort
a. Derived from the same population as the exposed (2)
b. Derived from a different source (1)
c. Other, no description (0)
2. Adjustment of confounders
a. Adjustment for most important potential confounders (2)
b. Adjustment for some potential confounders (1)
c. Adjustment for no confounders except age, gender, race/ethnicity, calendar period (0)
3. Ascertainment of exposure
a. Objective record (e.g., employment records, biomarkers) (2)
b. Structured interview blind to outcome status, GIS (1)
c. Interview not blinded outcome status, self-report, proxy (e.g., residence) (0.5)
d. No description (0)
4. Follow-up rate
a. Follow-up of both groups over 90% (2)
b. Follow-up of one or both groups between 60- 90% (1)
c. Follow-up of one group under 60%, no description (0)
5. Latency
a. Adequate latency between exposure and outcome (>15 yrs) (2)
b. Limited latency between exposure and outcome (5-15 yrs) (1)
c. Inadequate latency between exposure and outcome (<5 yrs), no description (0)
6. Outcome
a. Cancer registration (2)
b. Death certificates, hospital records (1)
c. Self report (0.5)
d. No description (0)