Table 3.

Participants’ ratings on telemedicine support for OR, eOR (N=324).

Self-reported ratings (1 = extremely comfortable, 5 = extremely uncomfortable)	Median (IQR)
Level of comfort with the use of the eOR	2 (1–2)
Level of comfort with familiar doctors and nurses running the eOR during surgery	2 (1–2)
Level of comfort with unfamiliar doctors and nurses within the same hospital running the eOR during surgery?	2 (1–3)
Level of comfort with unfamiliar doctors and nurses within a different hospital or health system in the US running the eOR during surgery?	2 (2–3)
Level of comfort with unfamiliar doctors and nurses within a hospital or health system in another country running the eOR during surgery?	3 (2–4)
Self-reported ratings (1 = extremely likely, 5 = extremely unlikely)	Median (IQR)
Likelihood for using remote eOR tracking during surgery	2 (1–2)
Likelihood that the use of the eOR would improve surgery outcomes	2 (1–2)
Likelihood that the use of the eOR would worsen surgery outcomes	4 (2–5)
Likelihood that the use of the eOR would improve patient care quality	2 (1–2)
Likelihood that the use of the eOR would worsen patient care quality	4 (2–5)
Likelihood that the use of the eOR would improve patient safety	2 (1–2)
Likelihood that the use of the eOR would worsen patient safety	4 (2–5)
Self-reported ratings (1 = not at all concerned, 4 = extremely concerned)	Median (IQR)
Level of concern with eOR using your private health information	2 (1–3)
Level of concern that eOR will be a distraction to care teams in the operating room during surgery	2 (1–3)
Level of concern that care teams in the operating room would rely too much on eOR during surgery	2 (2–3)
Self-reported ratings (1 = strong understanding, 5 = no understanding)	Median (IQR)
Level of understanding about eOR use and functions	2 (1–2)