iPSC |
|
-
•
Constrained artificial environment
-
•
Lack complex tissue organisation and physiological context
-
•
Quality, purity and maturity of differentiated cells
-
•
Significant variability in differentiation potential and genetic stability between iPSC line
-
•
Absence of vascularization
-
•
Lack cognitive outcome measures
|
|
Organoid |
-
•
Human model system
-
•
Spatial organization of tissues, cell-cell and cell-matrix connections
-
•
Model complex interaction and connection amongst brain regions and structures
-
•
More mature phenotype of iPSC-derived cells
-
•
Can be maintained for extended periods
-
•
Drug screening and toxicity studies
|
-
•
Lack complex organisation of the in vivo brain
-
•
Significant variability in differentiation potential and genetic stability between iPSC line
-
•
Absence of vascularization
-
•
Absence of microglia
-
•
Lack of cognitive outcome measures
|
|
Zebrafish model |
-
•
Ease of genetic manipulation
-
•
Transparent during development allowing for non-invasive in vivo imaging
-
•
Prolific reproduction rates
-
•
Basic functional outcome measures
-
•
Drug screening and toxicity studies
|
|
|
Rodent models |
-
•
Study of non–cell-autonomous effects
-
•
Rapid assessment of neuronal and circuit function
-
•
Cognitive outcome measures
-
•
Availability of powerful genetic toolkits
-
•
Greater acceptability in terms of ethics compared to large mammalian model
|
-
•
Small white matter volume
-
•
Different brain structure relative to human
-
•
Domain specific genomic differences between rodent and human
-
•
Species differences when evaluating cognitive deficits and their relevance to human SVD progression
-
•
Inbred animals do not reflect the genetic diversity of a population
-
•
Short lifespan of rodents means that it is difficult to reproduce the symptoms of dementia
|
|
Large mammalian model |
-
•
Gyrencephalic brain anatomy
-
•
More white matter
-
•
More human-like vasculature
-
•
Longer lifespan than rodents
-
•
Non-human primate models allow for sophisticated cognitive tests and have a very close evolutionary relationship to humans
|
-
•
Relative lack of behavioural assays currently available compared to rodent models
-
•
Scarcity of species-specific reagents
-
•
Costly and therefore constrained by the number of centres which have the infrastructure and resources to house this model
-
•
Longer duration of studies
-
•
Ethical constraints
|