Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 11;5:100189. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100189

Table 3.

Strengths and limitations of preclinical models used within the VCI field.

Model Strengths Limitations
iPSC
  • Human model system

  • Genetic diversity

  • Ease of genetic manipulation

  • High throughput drug screening and toxicity studies

  • Constrained artificial environment

  • Lack complex tissue organisation and physiological context

  • Quality, purity and maturity of differentiated cells

  • Significant variability in differentiation potential and genetic stability between iPSC line

  • Absence of vascularization

  • Lack cognitive outcome measures


Organoid
  • Human model system

  • Spatial organization of tissues, cell-cell and cell-matrix connections

  • Model complex interaction and connection amongst brain regions and structures

  • More mature phenotype of iPSC-derived cells

  • Can be maintained for extended periods

  • Drug screening and toxicity studies

  • Lack complex organisation of the in vivo brain

  • Significant variability in differentiation potential and genetic stability between iPSC line

  • Absence of vascularization

  • Absence of microglia

  • Lack of cognitive outcome measures


Zebrafish model
  • Ease of genetic manipulation

  • Transparent during development allowing for non-invasive in vivo imaging

  • Prolific reproduction rates

  • Basic functional outcome measures

  • Drug screening and toxicity studies

  • Simpler nervous systems

  • Genomic differences between zebrafish and human greater than mammalian models

  • Lack higher cognitive outcome measures


Rodent models
  • Study of non–cell-autonomous effects

  • Rapid assessment of neuronal and circuit function

  • Cognitive outcome measures

  • Availability of powerful genetic toolkits

  • Greater acceptability in terms of ethics compared to large mammalian model

  • Small white matter volume

  • Different brain structure relative to human

  • Domain specific genomic differences between rodent and human

  • Species differences when evaluating cognitive deficits and their relevance to human SVD progression

  • Inbred animals do not reflect the genetic diversity of a population

  • Short lifespan of rodents means that it is difficult to reproduce the symptoms of dementia


Large mammalian model
  • Gyrencephalic brain anatomy

  • More white matter

  • More human-like vasculature

  • Longer lifespan than rodents

  • Non-human primate models allow for sophisticated cognitive tests and have a very close evolutionary relationship to humans

  • Relative lack of behavioural assays currently available compared to rodent models

  • Scarcity of species-specific reagents

  • Costly and therefore constrained by the number of centres which have the infrastructure and resources to house this model

  • Longer duration of studies

  • Ethical constraints