Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;120(29):e2303222120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2303222120

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Power spectra S1(ω) and real part of the autocorrelation function C1(t) of Q1* (x(t)) for the different models with parameters in A and B as in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. (A) For parameters from Fig. 1 (chosen such that λ1 = μ1 + 1 is approximately the same for all models with μ1 = −0.048, ω1 = 0.698, leading to a more coherent oscillation with a quality factor of |ω1/μ1|=14.3), we compare Eq. 15 (solid line) to stochastic simulations of the three models (symbols). (B) For parameters from Fig. 2 (chosen such that λ1 = μ1 + 1 is approximately the same for all models with μ1 = −0.168, ω1 = 0.241, leading to a less coherent oscillation with a quality factor of |ω1/μ1|=1.43), we compare Eq. 15 (solid line) to stochastic simulations of the three models (symbols).