Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 10;120(29):e2117484120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117484120

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Prediction of the connectivity with the NNC and emergence of LN groups. (A) Correlation between the four ORNs LN connection weight vectors {wk} from NNC-4 (ρ=1) and the four ORNs LNtype synaptic count vectors {wLNtype} (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 C, D, F, G, and H). One-sided P-values calculated by shuffling the entries of each wLNtype (50,000 permutations). *: significant at 0.05 FDR. (B) Bottom: maximum correlation coefficient (mean ± SD) of the four wks from NNC-4 with the four wLNtypes for different values of ρ (50 simulations per ρ), encoding the feedback inhibition strength. Top: number of wLNtypes significantly correlated with at last one wk from NNC-4 (FDR at 5%). For ρ3.1, not all simulations converge to the same {y(t)}, {z(t)}, and {wk}, potentially due to existence of multiple global optima or simulations only finding local optima. (C) Correlation between the wLNs on the left and right sides of the larva, portraying that several wLNs are similar. (D) Same as (C) for the eight wks arising from NNC-8 and with ρ=0.1,0.35,1,10. Matrices ordered using hierarchical clustering and wks ordered accordingly (SI Appendix). (E) Mean rectified correlation coefficient r¯+ (r+:=max[0,r]) from (C) (blue band delimited by the value for left and right circuit) and from NNC-8 (black line, mean ± SD, 50 simulations per ρ). r¯+ obtained by averaging all the r+ from a correlation matrix, i.e., (C) or (D), excluding the diagonal.