Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 25;7(8):igad109. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad109

Table 3.

Study Quality Assessment

Assessment Criterion Breen (2009) Clarke & Clarkson (2008) Ejaz et al. (1997) Iso-Ahola & Weissinger (1987) Lobo (1996) Losada et al. 2015 Searle et al. (1995)
Searle et al. (1998)
1. Research question 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1
2. Representative population 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3. Subject selection 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
4. Sample size 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. Boredom explained 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 0 0
6. Leisure explained 0.5 0 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1
7. Boredom measurement 0 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 1
8. Leisure measurement 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1
9. Sufficient time frame 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1
10. Control compounding factors 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1
Total 5 4.5 7.5 7.5 5 6 8 8
Quality category Moderate Moderate High High Moderate Moderate High High