Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Physiol. 2021 Dec 6;599(24):5465–5484. doi: 10.1113/JP282321

Figure 4: Exemplar MGB unit showing differential responses to SAM presentation order, modulation depth and CT blockade:

Figure 4:

A. a representative MGB unit showing a higher discharge rate (spikes/sec) to randomly presented SAMΔ100% across fmods than to predictable/repeating SAMΔ100% stimuli in dot raster and rate-modulation transfer functions (rMTFs). B. When modulation depth was decreased to SAMΔ25%, less distinct stimuli, the same MGB unit showed increased/greater responses to a predictable/repeating SAM, especially at higher fms. C. Optical blockade of CT input resulted in a return to strong random preference even in response to less distinct stimuli, SAMΔ25% in this same exemplar.