Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 11;14(43):12091–12097. doi: 10.1039/d3sc03686c

Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d3sc03686c-u1.jpg
Entry CPA Solvent T (°C) Yieldb (%) eec (%)
1 (R)-CPA1 CHCl3 RT 96 50 : 50
2 (R)-CPA2 CHCl3 RT 95 54 : 45
3 (R)-CPA3 CHCl3 RT Trace
4 (R)-CPA4 CHCl3 RT 93 50 : 50
5 (R)-CPA5 CHCl3 RT 95 50 : 50
6 (R)-CPA6 CHCl3 RT 96 61 : 39
7 (R)-CPA7 CHCl3 RT 90 50 : 50
8 (R)-CPA8 CHCl3 RT 90 69 : 31
9 (R)-CPA9 CHCl3 RT 95 65 : 35
10 (R)-CPA10 CHCl3 RT Trace
11 (S)-CPA11 CHCl3 RT 90 76 : 24
12 (S)-CPA12 CHCl3 RT 93 89 : 11
13 (S)-CPA13 CHCl3 RT 94 74 : 26
14 (S)-CPA14 CHCl3 RT 96 84 : 16
15 (S)-CPA12 EtOAc RT Trace
16 (S)-CPA12 THF RT Trace
17 (S)-CPA12 CH3CN RT 92 60 : 40
18 (S)-CPA12 Acetone RT Trace
19 (S)-CPA12 Toluene RT 95 91 : 9
20 (S)-CPA12 Toluene 10 95 92 : 8
21 (S)-CPA12 Toluene 0 93 93 : 7
22 (S)-CPA12 Toluene −10 90 95 : 5
23 (S)-CPA12 Toluene −40 50 95 : 5
a

All reactions were carried out with 0.2 mmol 1a in 2 mL of solvent catalyzed by CPA (10 mol%).

b

Isolated yield of the two steps overall.

c

The er value was determined by chiral HPLC analysis.