Table 2.
Age-Controlled Comparison of Functional Metrics Between eAMD and iAMD Subgroups
| iAMD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | eAMD Model Estimate [95% CI] | Model Estimate [95% CI] | T Value | P Value |
| BCVA (logMAR) | −0.39 [−0.72 to −0.07] | −0.37 [−0.76 to −0.02] | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| LLVA (logMAR) | −0.19 [−0.58 to −0.21] | −0.18 [−0.65 to −0.30] | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| CS Gabor 3 cpd (logCS) | 2.62 [1.33–3.91] | 2.43 [0.87–3.99] | −1.4 | 0.2 |
| Metrics deduced from qCSF method | ||||
| CA (logCPD) | 1.76 [1.33–2.20] | 1.71 [1.20–2.24] | −1.1 | 0.3 |
| AULCSF (logCS•logCPD) | 2.15 [1.35–2.94] | 2.05 [1.09–3.0] | −1.3 | 0.2 |
| CS at specific spatial frequencies | ||||
| 1 cpd (logCS) | 1.91 [1.46–2.36] | 1.78 [1.24–2.32] | −2.9 | 0.006 |
| 1.5 cpd (logCS) | 2.11 [1.65–2.58] | 1.99 [1.44–2.55] | −2.7 | 0.01 |
| 3 cpd (logCS) | 2.32 [1.66–2.98] | 2.22 [1.43–3.01] | −1.5 | 0.1 |
| 6 cpd (logCS) | 2.10 [1.18–3.01] | 2.01 [0.91–3.10] | −1.0 | 0.3 |
| 12 cpd (logCS) | 1.61 [0.56–2.66] | 1.53 [0.27–2.78] | −0.8 | 0.4 |
| 18 cpd (logCS) | 0.90 [0.12–1.67] | 0.85 [−0.08 to −1.78] | −0.6 | 0.5 |