Table 1.

Mosaicking performance in terms of mean ± standard deviation of ${\text{SSIM}}_5$ for all the videos in the dataset between Bano et al. (EM1), SIFT (EM2), ORB (EM3) and the proposed framework without occlusion recovery (EM4)

Video #	EM1	EM2	EM3	EM4
1	$\mathbf{0.8556}\pm \mathbf{0.0809}$	$0.8241\pm 0.1512$	$0.8098\pm 0.1170$	$0.8257\pm 0.0834$
2	$\mathbf{0.8714}\pm \mathbf{0.0666}$	$0.8441\pm 0.0563$	$0.6353\pm 0.3585$	$0.8497\pm 0.0553$
3	$0.8670\pm 0.1079$	$0.7658\pm 0.3060$	$0.5713\pm 0.4197$	$\mathbf{0.8946}\pm \mathbf{0.0440}$
4	$0.7457\pm 0.1921$	–	$0.4526\pm 0.4134$	$\mathbf{0.7526}\pm \mathbf{0.1773}$
5	$\mathbf{0.9445}\pm \mathbf{0.8720}$	$0.5415\pm 0.4021$	$0.4911\pm 0.4339$	$0.9406\pm 0.0316$
6	$0.8720\pm 0.0646$	–	$0.0309\pm 0.1358$	$\mathbf{0.8750}\pm \mathbf{0.0610}$
7	$0.8133\pm 0.2429$	$0.8974\pm 0.0333$	$0.8999\pm 0.0295$	$\mathbf{0.8455}\pm \mathbf{0.1200}$
8	$0.7603\pm 0.2623$	$0.8740\pm 0.0710$	$0.7961\pm 0.2560$	$\mathbf{0.8463}\pm \mathbf{0.0808}$
9	$0.7947\pm 0.1506$	–	$0.5777\pm 0.4129$	$\mathbf{0.9195}\pm \mathbf{0.0598}$
10	$0.8155\pm 0.1649$	–	$0.8209\pm 0.2749$	$\mathbf{0.9239}\pm \mathbf{0.0653}$

The highest average values are shown in bold. The values in italic represent mosaics that were discarded after visual inspection due to errors in reconstruction