Table 3.

Mean values of coupling coordination degree between agriculture and tourism in each prefecture of Xinjiang (2009–2018).

Prefecture	Evaluation value of agriculture	Evaluation value of tourism	Coupling degree	Coupling coordinated degree	Coordination type	Main restriction factor
Urumchi	0.077	0.388	0.374	0.291	Moderate disorder	Lagging of agriculture development
Karamay	0.047	0.034	0.492	0.139	Severe disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Turpan	0.092	0.061	0.482	0.192	Severe disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Hami	0.071	0.027	0.448	0.148	Severe disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Changji	0.349	0.083	0.358	0.278	Moderate disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Ili	0.733	0.430	0.465	0.518	On the verge of disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Tacheng	0.315	0.025	0.253	0.207	Moderate disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Altay	0.110	0.094	0.497	0.227	Moderate disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Bortala	0.099	0.025	0.391	0.155	Severe disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Bayingol	0.254	0.066	0.401	0.253	Moderate disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Aksu	0.386	0.034	0.271	0.238	Moderate disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Kizilsu	0.052	0.009	0.335	0.101	Severe disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Kashgar	0.522	0.060	0.299	0.296	Moderate disorder	Lagging of tourism development
Hotan	0.191	0.015	0.262	0.163	Severe disorder	Lagging of tourism development