Table 3.
Evaluation of the Risk of Bias of Studies.
Criteria | Alavi vd.,2017 | Cenkçi, 2017 | Hamdamian vd.,2018 | Tanvisut vd.,2018 | Yazdkhasti & Pirak, 2016 | Esmaelzadeh vd., 2018 | Vakilian vd., 2018 | Janula ve Singh, 2014 | Janula ve Singh, 2015 | Joseph ve Fernandes, 2013 | Kaviani vd.,2014 (a) | Kaviani vd.,2014 (b) | Lamadah ve Nomani, 2016 | Namazi vd.,2014 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk of bias arising from the randomization process | ? | + | + | + | + | + | + | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Risk of bias due to deviations from intended interventions (impact of assignment on intervention) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Risk of bias due to deviations from intended interventions (effect of adherence to the intervention) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Risk of bias due to missing outcome data | ? | ? | + | ? | ? | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + | + |
Risk of bias in measuring outcome | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Risk of bias in selection of the reported outcome | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
+ Low risk of bias ? Suspicious bias risk -High risk of bias