Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct;192:None. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276

Table 1.

Patient and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) characteristics.

All patients
n = 377
Active surveillance n = 288 Conventional treatment
n = 89
Age (median) 59 59 57
n (%) n (%) n (%) p-valuea

Age 0.188
 45–54
55–64
65–74
75–84
134 (36)
125 (33)
109 (29)
9 (2)
99 (34)
92 (32)
88 (31)
9 (3)
35 (39)
33 (37)
21 (24)
0
DCIS grade 0.184
 Grade 1
Grade 2
Not yet registered
126 (34)
146 (39)
105 (28)
93 (32)
108 (38)
87 (30)
33 (37)
38 (43)
18 (20)
DCIS size 0.532
 < 20 mm
20–49 mm
≥ 50 mm
Not yet registered
190 (50)
45 (12)
13 (3)
129 (34)
142 (49)
32 (11)
11 (4)
103 (36)
48 (54)
13 (15)
2 (2)
26 (29)
Educational levelb 0.015
 Low
Intermediate
High
130 (35)
114 (30)
133 (35)
110 (38)
85 (30)
93 (32)
20 (22)
29 (33)
40 (45)
Employment status 0.495
 Unemployed
Working
Retired
75 (20)
227 (60)
75 (20)
62 (22)
168 (58)
58 (20)
13 (15)
59 (66)
17 (19)
Relationship status 0.750
 Single
In a relationship
66 (18)
311 (83)
52 (18)
236 (82)
14 (16)
75 (84)
Smoking 0.706
 Never
Currently a smoker
Not anymore
174 (46)
47 (13)
155 (41)
131 (46)
35 (12)
122 (42)
43 (49)
12 (14)
33 (38)
Tolerance of uncertainty 0.680
 High tolerance
Low Tolerance
278 (74)
99 (26)
214 (74)
74 (26)
64 (72)
26 (28)
HADS score for anxiety 0.135
 Not elevated
Elevated
317 (84)
60 (16)
247 (86)
41 (14)
70 (79)
19 (21)

Abbreviation: mm, millimetre.

a

p-values were calculated using Fisher’s exact tests.

b

Educational level was categorised in three levels: low level (i.e. elementary school, secondary vocational education), moderate level (i.e. high school, post-secondary vocational education) and high level (i.e. higher vocational education or university).