Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 23;9(11):e21436. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21436

Table 4.

The results of the robustness test.

Independent variable Model1
Model2
Model3
Model4
Model5
Model6
non-shrinking cities shrinking cities non-shrinking cities shrinking cities non-shrinking cities shrinking cities
Household savings balance 0.291*** 0.119** 0.298*** 0.124** 0.299*** 0.121**
The number of industrial enterprises above designated size −0.425*** −0.047 −0.425*** −0.049 −0.424*** −0.052
GDP per capita 0.268*** −0.736*** 0.264*** −0.729*** 0.263*** −0.702***
Financial revenue and expenditure −0.074* 0.119*** −0.074* 0.121*** −0.075* 0.122***
Highway mileage 0.282*** −0.007 0.285*** 0.011 0.291*** −0.01
The proportion of primary and secondary school students 0.064 0.114** 0.061 0.112** 0.065 0.111**
The proportion of secondary and tertiary production 0.117** 0.117** 0.114* 0.119** 0.113* 0.099**
Population density 1.211** −0.101 1.256** −0.104 1.360** −0.109
Number of medical beds −0.009 −0.015 −0.006 −0.017
Whether under a resource-exhausted city 0.021 −0.041
Chi2 102.38 76.55 101.43 76.57 100.95 78.83
P > Chi2 0 0 0 0 0 0
R2 0.2517 0.1574 0.2529 0.1574 0.2545 0.1584
Total sample size 275 418 275 418 275 418

Note: *, ** and *** respectively represent passing the significance test underthe confidence interval of 90 %, 95 % and 99 %.