Table 4.
The results of the robustness test.
| Independent variable | Model1 |
Model2 |
Model3 |
Model4 |
Model5 |
Model6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| non-shrinking cities | shrinking cities | non-shrinking cities | shrinking cities | non-shrinking cities | shrinking cities | |
| Household savings balance | 0.291*** | 0.119** | 0.298*** | 0.124** | 0.299*** | 0.121** |
| The number of industrial enterprises above designated size | −0.425*** | −0.047 | −0.425*** | −0.049 | −0.424*** | −0.052 |
| GDP per capita | 0.268*** | −0.736*** | 0.264*** | −0.729*** | 0.263*** | −0.702*** |
| Financial revenue and expenditure | −0.074* | 0.119*** | −0.074* | 0.121*** | −0.075* | 0.122*** |
| Highway mileage | 0.282*** | −0.007 | 0.285*** | 0.011 | 0.291*** | −0.01 |
| The proportion of primary and secondary school students | 0.064 | 0.114** | 0.061 | 0.112** | 0.065 | 0.111** |
| The proportion of secondary and tertiary production | 0.117** | 0.117** | 0.114* | 0.119** | 0.113* | 0.099** |
| Population density | 1.211** | −0.101 | 1.256** | −0.104 | 1.360** | −0.109 |
| Number of medical beds | −0.009 | −0.015 | −0.006 | −0.017 | ||
| Whether under a resource-exhausted city | 0.021 | −0.041 | ||||
| Chi2 | 102.38 | 76.55 | 101.43 | 76.57 | 100.95 | 78.83 |
| P > Chi2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R2 | 0.2517 | 0.1574 | 0.2529 | 0.1574 | 0.2545 | 0.1584 |
| Total sample size | 275 | 418 | 275 | 418 | 275 | 418 |
Note: *, ** and *** respectively represent passing the significance test underthe confidence interval of 90 %, 95 % and 99 %.