. 2023 Oct 5;102(12):103131. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103131

Table 3.

Analyzed nutrient composition (%, as fed basis, unless stated) and enzyme activities of the experimental diets.

Treatments	Moisture	Ash	Fat	Crude fiber	CP	Ca	P	Phytase, FTU/kg	Xylanase, U/kg
1–10 d of age
PC¹	9.71	5.08	7.09	3.63	21.70	0.88	0.70	161	0
NC1¹	10.32	4.02	4.28	3.73	20.30	0.65	0.47	113	42
NC1+PhyG	10.12	4.29	4.30	3.68	21.99	0.65	0.47	1,866	4
NC2¹	10.33	4.44	3.23	3.55	21.10	0.68	0.48	123	90
NC2+PhyG+XB	10.15	4.39	3.06	3.53	21.66	0.68	0.48	2,010	1,140
11–21 d of age
PC	8.89	5.38	7.05	4.60	20.07	0.80	0.64	188	153
NC1	9.79	4.56	4.44	4.44	19.95	0.61	0.42	167	0
NC1+PhyG	9.60	4.52	4.13	4.55	20.05	0.59	0.42	1,444	0
NC2	9.96	4.59	3.04	4.36	20.14	0.61	0.43	144	0
NC2+PhyG+XB	9.46	4.65	2.92	4.62	19.99	0.61	0.44	1,434	1,106
22–32 d of age
PC	9.62	4.37	7.50	4.13	19.33	0.71	0.60	267	0
NC1	9.72	3.53	5.75	4.12	18.75	0.53	0.40	306	0
NC1+PhyG	9.59	3.56	5.61	3.89	18.96	0.53	0.36	1,021	0
NC2	9.65	3.58	4.23	3.65	19.07	0.48	0.37	207	0
NC2+PhyG+XB	9.95	3.51	4.23	3.69	18.85	0.48	0.39	1,114	1,490

PC, nutritionally adequate positive control; NC1, reduced in digestible P, Ca, digestible AA, ME, and Na vs. PC diet, to account for the expected contribution of the phytase, as detailed in Table 1; NC2, reduced in digestible P, Ca, digestible AA, ME, and Na vs. PC to account for the expected contribution of the phytase and the xylanase and β-glucanase preparation (XB), as detailed in Table 1.