Table 2.
Frequency of coercive measures during the second stay of each pair (outcome variable).
Sequence of ward types | Coercive measures | All | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No measures | Forced medication | Seclusion | |||||
n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | ||
O – O | 11,959 | (97.0%) | 18 | (0.2%) | 347 | (2.8%) | 12,324 |
O – O/C | 83 | (81.4%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 19 | (18.6%) | 102 |
O – C | 463 | (85.1%) | 3 | (0.6%) | 78 | (14.3%) | 544 |
O/C – O | 145 | (98.0%) | 1 | (0.7%) | 2 | (1.4%) | 148 |
O/C – C | 75 | (76.5%) | 1 | (1.0%) | 22 | (22.5%) | 98 |
C – O | 1,339 | (96.1%) | 3 | (0.2%) | 51 | (3.7%) | 1,393 |
C – O/C | 70 | (66.0%) | 1 | (0.9%) | 35 | (33.0%) | 106 |
C – C | 2,004 | (85.7%) | 10 | (0.4%) | 325 | (13.9%) | 2,339 |
All | 16,138 | (94.6%) | 37 | (0.2%) | 879 | (5.2%) | 17,054 |
In case of presence of forced medication and seclusion, these stays are listed under the category “seclusion”.