Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurolinguistics. 2023 Aug 4;68:101159. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2023.101159

Table 5.

Results of GCA analysis for time window 1 (interference in embedded clause) within the IWA group.

Predictors Estimates CI p
Intercept 0.34 0.30 – 0.38 <0.001
Linear −0.00 −0.14 – 0.14 0.998
Image[N2] −0.04 −0.09 – 0.00 0.062
Condition[Inanimate] 0.05 0.02 – 0.08 <0.001
Linear*Image[N2] 0.18 0.01 – 0.35 0.040
Linear*Condition[Inanimate] −0.13 −0.24 – −0.02 0.025
Image[N2]*Condition[Inanimate] −0.12 −0.14 – −0.10 <0.001
Linear*Image[N2]*Condition[Inanimate] 0.22 0.11 – 0.32 <0.001

Note: The table shows the summary results of the model for the IWA group, which included the interaction between images and conditions on the intercept and linear time terms. Results in boldface are presented in the text.