Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 25;14:1229457. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1229457

Table 1.

Comparison of quantitative trait nucleotide (QTN) identification for different GWAS models and genotypic datasets.

Statistical model Genotypic dataset NO. of detected QTNs NO. of common QTNs by models or datasets NO. of non–significant QTNs NO. of tag QTNs R2 range (%)
GEMMA ALL 4 2 0 2 1.11–10.00
FarmCPU ALL 25 6 0 6 1.11–12.11
mrMLM ALL 89 51 10 41 0.66–12.72
3VmrMLM ALL 149 52 12 41 0.66–16.98
GEMMA GB 1 1 0 1 1.11
FarmCPU GB 17 8 1 7 1.11–13.30
mrMLM GB 90 74 12 62 0.68–20.54
3VmrMLM GB 105 75 13 62 0.68–20.54
GEMMA RGAB 2 2 0 2 9.34–22.42
FarmCPU RGAB 10 9 2 7 0.54–22.42
mrMLM RGAB 28 25 4 23 0.52–17.40
3VmrMLM RGAB 55 32 3 30 0.52–17.40

ALL, all SNPs: GB, gene SNPs: RGAB, resistance gene analog (RGA) based SNPs.