Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 31;101(18):e1771–e1778. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207747

Table 3.

Hazard Ratios for Incident Dementia by Cumulative Proton Pump Inhibitor Use, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, 2011–2017

graphic file with name WNL-2023-001702t3.jpg

Exposure to proton pump inhibitors before baseline
0 d 1 d–2.8 y >2.8–4.4 y >4.4 y
(n = 4,222) (n = 497) (n = 496) (n = 497)
Outcome: incident dementia
 No. of dementia events 415 56 56 58
 No. of person-yearsa 21,941.5 2,591.3 2,631.9 2,437.8
 Crude IR/1,000 person-years (95% CI) 18.9 (17.1–20.8) 21.6 (16.3–28.1) 21.3 (16.1–27.6) 23.8 (18.1–30.8)
 Model 1 HR (95% CI) 1 (reference) 1.12 (0.85–1.49) 1.09 (0.82–1.44) 1.38 (1.04–1.82)
 Model 2 HR (95% CI) 1 (reference) 1.14 (0.86–1.51) 1.12 (0.85–1.49) 1.42 (1.07–1.87)
 Model 3 HR (95% CI) 1 (reference) 1.10 (0.83–1.46) 1.09 (0.82–1.45) 1.33 (1.00–1.77)

Abbreviations: APOE = Apolipoprotein E4; H2RA = H2 receptor antagonist; HR = hazard ratio; IR = incidence rate.

Model 1: adjusted for demographics (age, sex, race, center, education) + APOE4.

Model 2: adjusted for model 1 covariates + BMI.

Model 3: adjusted for model 2 covariates + hypertension, diabetes, stroke, aspirin use, and cumulative H2RA use.

a

We calculated person-years of follow-up as time elapsed from the baseline date (visit 5) to whichever came first: dementia event, loss to follow-up, death, or administratively censored at December 2017.