Abstract
Environmental and genetic risk factors, and their interactions, contribute significantly to the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Recent epidemiology studies have implicated pyrethroid pesticides as an environmental risk factor for autism and developmental delay. Our previous research showed that low-dose developmental exposure to the pyrethroid pesticide deltamethrin in mice caused male-biased changes in the brain and in NDD-relevant behaviors in adulthood. Here, we used a metabolomics approach to determine the broadest possible set of metabolic changes in the adult male mouse brain caused by low-dose pyrethroid exposure during development. Using a litter-based design, we exposed mouse dams during pregnancy and lactation to deltamethrin (3 mg/kg or vehicle every 3 days) at a concentration well below the EPA-determined benchmark dose used for regulatory guidance. We raised male offspring to adulthood and collected whole brain samples for untargeted high-resolution metabolomics analysis. Developmentally exposed mice had disruptions in 116 metabolites which clustered into pathways for folate biosynthesis, retinol metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism. As a cross-validation, we integrated metabolomics and transcriptomics data from the same samples, which confirmed previous findings of altered dopamine signaling. These results suggest that pyrethroid exposure during development leads to disruptions in metabolism in the adult brain, which may inform both prevention and therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: pyrethroids, developmental exposure, metabolomics, brain
1. Introduction:
Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are a cluster of lifelong brain disorders including autism spectrum disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), learning disabilities, sensory impairments, schizophrenia, and intellectual disabilities1,2. These are often incurable disorders with limited biomarkers and treatment options3. The prevalence of NDDs is rapidly rising, affecting as many as 17% of children in the United States4. Research has historically focused on genetic factors in the etiology of NDDs, however, recent studies have shown that genetic anomalies can only account for 30–40% of all cases, and that environmental risk and gene-environment interactions may contribute substantially the risk for autism5–9. Environmental toxicants such as air pollution10, heavy metals (lead and mercury)11, persistent organic pollutants (DDT and polychlorinated biphenyls)12,13, flame retardants (polybrominated diphenyl ethers and organophosphate esters)14,15, and pesticides (organophosphates and pyrethroids)16 have been implicated in risk for NDDs in humans17,18. Understanding the risk factors associated with NDDs and their underlying molecular mechanisms is critical for prevention and the development of therapeutic strategies.
One potential environmental factor of concern is developmental exposure to pyrethroid pesticides. Pyrethroids are neurotoxic chemicals commonly used for agriculture and mosquito fogging, and in household applications such as insect sprays, flea collars, and head lice shampoos19. Pyrethroids are thought to be safe for adults and have low environmental impact, making them one of the most widely used pesticide classes in the US, with 70–80% of the general US population having detectable pyrethroid metabolites in their blood20,21. Nonetheless, epidemiology studies have shown that prenatal exposure to pyrethroids is a risk factor for NDDs16,22,23 and that pyrethroid metabolite levels in the blood of pregnant women is associated with parent-reported mental development in the child24. Moreover, pyrethroid metabolites in blood and urine are associated with the risk for ADHD in children20,21.
Mouse models have recently been developed to study comparable effects of developmental exposure to deltamethrin, a type II pyrethroid, in humans20,25–27. These models reproduce the oral route of exposure, which is the most common route of chronic exposure in humans; and, to control for bioaccumulation, exposures are performed every 3 days, an interval at which the pesticide and its metabolites are expected to be entirely cleared. Deltamethrin exposure in mice during pregnancy and lactation at doses well below the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benchmark dose of 14.5 mg/kg is sufficient to cause a broad range of changes in the brain and behavior of the offspring. Behaviorally, deltamethrin exposure during development results in hyperactivity, repetitive behaviors, reduced vocalizations, impulsivity, and learning deficits20,25. In the brain, developmental deltamethrin exposure leads to broad changes in striatal dopamine signaling, altered levels of voltage-gated sodium channels, elevated endoplasmic reticulum stress, altered brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, and changes in molecular pathways for circadian rhythms and synaptic plasticity26,28–33. Behavioral effects in this model primarily impact male mice, and molecular effects are similarly male-biased. However, the underlying processes altered by deltamethrin exposure to drive these broad changes are unknown, hindering the identification of effective therapeutic targets or the identification of biomarkers.
Metabolomics – the quantitative measure of all low-molecular-weight biological molecules detectable in a sample using advanced analytical chemistry techniques34 – is beginning to be recognized as an invaluable tool for translational research related to biomarker discovery, drug target discovery, drug responses, and disease mechanisms35. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics detects and quantifies thousands of molecular features simultaneously, which are identified by a combination of retention time and signature36. These molecular features are then mapped onto specific metabolites using annotated reference databases. Metabolomics has the potential to identify metabolic processes that are disrupted by developmental exposure to pesticides in an unbiased manner, providing the foundation for testable hypotheses identifying biomarkers or drug targets and describing mechanisms driving the broad changes in the brain observed with developmental pesticide exposure.
In this study, we exposed pregnant mouse dams to a low level of deltamethrin (3 mg/kg every 3 days) throughout pregnancy and lactation. This dose was chosen based on prior studies showing behavioral and neurological effects in offspring at this developmental dose20,25,33 and because it is substantially lower than both the EPA-determined benchmark dose19 and the developmental no observable adverse effect level37. We chose to focus on male offspring because both the behavioral and molecular outcomes of developmental pyrethroid exposure (DPE) have been male-biased, so the most significant changes in brain metabolism would be expected to occur in males. Deltamethrin readily penetrates all regions of the brain following acute oral exposure in mice, potentially affecting many brain regions38; and following acute oral exposure in pregnant mice, the related pyrethroid permethrin crosses the placenta into the embryo, where it potentially accesses the entire developing brain39. We therefore selected the whole brain as our level of investigation in order to best represent major changes in brain metabolism across many brain regions and majority cell types. In line with these decision points, we performed untargeted high-resolution metabolomics on whole-brain tissue collected from the adult male offspring. As a cross-validation method, we performed transcriptomics on split brain samples from the same subjects. We hypothesized that low-dose developmental pyrethroid exposure would lead to changes in metabolic processes in the adult brain.
2. Materials and Methods:
2.1. Animals.
Experimental subjects were the adult (P56+) male offspring of female C57BL6/J mouse dams. Virgin dams were kept on a 12/12 hour light cycle and given access to water and high-fat breeder food ad libitum. Dams were housed in female pairs, then in trios with a male sire until 3 days prior to birth, and finally singly housed through birth and weaning. Offspring were weaned at 20–22 days of age into single-sex cages of 3–5 mice and were socially housed continuously into adulthood. All procedures were approved by the Emory University IACUC and performed in accordance with the US Animal Welfare Act.
2.2. Chemicals.
Deltamethrin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) is the reference pyrethroid selected by the EPA (EPA, 2011). Aliquots were prepared by dissolving deltamethrin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in acetone (Sigma), mixing with corn oil (Mazola, Memphis, TN), allowing the acetone to evaporate overnight, and then storing at −80° C in capped borosilicate glass vials (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) until the day of use. Aliquots of vehicle were prepared by allowing a similar volume of acetone to evaporate in corn oil.
2.3. Study design.
The study design consisted of two independent groups: pesticide exposed and vehicle control. Mouse dams were exposed to deltamethrin (or vehicle) during preconception, pregnancy, and lactation as described below. The experimental groups for these experiments were composed of a single adult male offspring from each of the resulting litters.
2.4. Experimental units.
Since experimental exposure was given to the dam, the experimental unit was the dam/litter, and each dam/litter was counted as N=1. A single male offspring was chosen at random to represent the litter.
2.5. Elimination criteria.
Dams and their litters were eliminated from the study if they did not consume 90% of the peanut butter containing the pesticide or vehicle during 90% of the feedings (see below), if they did not give birth within 28 days of being paired with a sire, or if their litter did not contain at least one male and one female pup.
2.6. Sample size.
A total of 40 female mice, pre-screened for peanut butter preference, (N=20 per group) were offered experimental or control treatment in this study. Three dams were eliminated due to inconsistent consumption, and two dams failed to produce a litter within 28 days of pairing. Four whole-brain samples were eliminated for litter size/composition. This left N=18 exposed and N=13 control samples.
2.7. Developmental pyrethroid exposure (DPE).
Mice were developmentally exposed to the pyrethroid pesticide deltamethrin as previously described25. Starting two weeks prior to being paired with a male, dams were fed deltamethrin (3 mg/kg by voluntary oral consumption in peanut butter/corn oil) or vehicle once every 3 days, continuing throughout pre-conception, pregnancy, and weaning. Dams were weighed immediately prior to each feeding, and the appropriate amount of corn oil was mixed with JIF peanut butter (J.M. Smucker, Orville, OH) to achieve the desired dose. To ensure that cagemates and offspring did not consume the peanut butter, adult cagemates were temporarily separated and peanut butter was provided in an elevated position. Dams that failed to consume 90% of the peanut butter during 90% of the feedings were eliminated from the study. Offspring were only exposed to deltamethrin indirectly through the dam. Offspring were weaned from the dam as above and received no additional treatment until experimental testing.
2.8. Tissue.
Adult male offspring were sacrificed by rapid decapitation and dissected. The brains were flash-frozen using liquid nitrogen and pulverized. The resulting powder was aliquoted for use in split-sample multiomics33.
2.9. Untargeted high-resolution metabolomics.
Pulverized brain tissue aliquots were shipped on dry ice to the HERCULES High Resolution Metabolomics Core at Emory University. Sample preparation and high-resolution tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) were performed by the Core. The Metabolomics Core sent the results of LC-MS metabolomics in the form of raw feature tables for both c18neg and hilicpos modes, which were generated by the Core using xMSanalyzer and xMSannotator40,41. As this was an untargeted analysis, the Metabolomics Core included quantitative standards only for a small subset of common metabolites. Therefore, we considered the pathway analysis to be the primary outcome.
2.9.1. Metabolomics preprocessing.
The R package xmsPANDA (version 1.3.2) was used for data filtering of features with missing values, log2 transformation, and quantile normalization42. xmsPANDA was then used to identify features of interest based on two criteria: (1) the feature is significantly different between the two groups (p<0.05 uncorrected, Limma t-test); and (2) the feature is important in discerning between the two groups, as determined by a variable importance in the projection (VIP) score >2 (partial least-squares discriminant analysis). VIP scores, p-values and log fold change were used to generate volcano and Manhattan plots and to conduct unsupervised two-dimensional hierarchical clustering analysis.
2.9.2. Metabolite annotation.
Features of interest were mapped to the KEGG and HMDB databases using the web-based tool, MetaboAnalyst 5.043,44. Feature tables from xmsPANDA were used as input into the tool’s modules for data filtering, normalization, feature selection, and statistical analysis. Mummichog pathway analysis was used with default parameters as the primary outcome of interest.
2.9.3. Metabolite abundance.
Because we chose an untargeted metabolomics approach, the Metabolomics Core included quantitative metabolite standards only for a small list of common metabolites. Therefore, we considered metabolite abundance as a descriptive analysis. The xmsPANDA (version 1.3.2) “quant” function was used to calculate individual metabolite abundances (in μM) using these pre-quantified metabolite standards. Raw feature tables (including the standards) were input into the quant function with a mass tolerance of 5 ppm, a retention time of 30 seconds, and all other parameters set to default.
2.10. Transcriptomics data analysis.
Previously existing data from split-sample transcriptomics on the same brain samples was used to complement and cross-validate the metabolomics data33. Briefly, aliquots of the same frozen brain samples used in metabolomics were homogenized, the lysate centrifuged and filtered, and aliquots prepared using the RNEasy Plus Micro Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD). Extracted RNA aliquots were sent to the University of Michigan Advanced Genomics Core for quality control, library preparation, and next generation sequencing. The University of Michigan provided paired end FASTQ files, which we aligned to the GRCm38 mouse genome using Hisat245, counted using GenomicAlignments and GenomicFeatures46, and compared between groups using Deseq247. A variance partition48 was used to select genes of interest that were both differentially expressed between groups (p<0.05 uncorrected) and had at least 15% of the variance in expression explained by group.
2.11. Transcriptome Perturbagen Analysis.
Post-processed differential gene expression data were compared to the iLINCS online database using concordant and discordant perturbagen analysis49,50. The R packages drugfindR (version 0.99.556) and biomaRt (version 2.60) were used. The following parameters were used: Output_lib =“CP”, filter threshold =0.075, similarity threshold = 0.321. P values were converted to FDR-corrected q values using the total database size of 143,374 chemical perturbagen signatures.
2.12. Integration of transcriptome and metabolome data sets.
Split-sample transcriptome and metabolome data from the same subjects were integrated to provide a cross-validated set of differentially represented pathway clusters. We used the MetaboAnalyst Joint Pathway Analysis43 to combine our list of genes of interest with our list of annotated metabolites of interest. The result is a list of differentially represented pathways with q-values, or false discovery rate corrected p-value. Differentially expressed pathways (q-value < 0.05) were clustered and visualized using PAVER51 (version 0.0.0.9000). PAVER generated UMAP scatter plots of clustered pathways and derived names for the clusters by selecting the term most similar to each cluster’s average embedding. Heatmaps were generated showing clusters organized by average cluster enrichment, with pathways inside the cluster organized by the enrichment score, which is equal to -log10 of the q-value (the FDR-corrected p-value).
3. Results:
3.1. Feature analysis.
We performed untargeted high-resolution metabolomics on whole-brain tissue from adult male DPE mice. Mass spectrometry detected 120,416 unique molecular features in the positive and negative ion modes (Supplemental File 1A–1B). Preprocessing of the raw data identified 731 molecular features of interest that were significantly different between DPE mice and controls (p<0.05 uncorrected) and were important in identifying differences between the groups (VIP > 2) (Figure 1A–B; Supplemental Figures S1–S3). Hierarchical clustering analysis using these 731 features was able to confidently separate the two groups (adjusted r=0.37; p=0.040; sample average silhouette width=0.12; Figure 1C). These 731 features mapped on to 116 annotated metabolites of interest (Supplemental File 1C). These results indicate that developmental pyrethroid exposure causes a change in molecular features of interest relative to controls.
Figure 1.
Molecular features of interest. Preprocessing of raw feature tables identified (A) positively charged and (B) negatively charged molecular features that were significantly different between groups (by p-value) and important in modeling differences between the groups (by VIP score). (C) A heat map shows the hierarchical clustering analysis that was performed using features of interest, which was able to confidently separate the two groups (adjusted r=0.37; p=0.040). Group subjects are clustered along the x-axis, with features of interest (mz/rt) on the y-axis.
3.2. Metabolite Pathway Analysis.
Pathway analysis was considered the primary outcome of interest for metabolomics due to the lack of broad quantitative standards in the untargeted approach. The 116 annotated metabolites of interest were used to identify metabolic pathways that were significantly altered in DPE mouse brain. Metabolites for folate biosynthesis, retinol metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism were significantly different between DPE mice and controls (hypergeometric test, p<0.02; Figure 3, Supplemental Figures S4–S6, Supplemental File 1D). Separately, a descriptive abundance analysis on the 94 metabolites for which quantitative standards were included was performed, only four of which mapped on to the pathways of interest (Figure 3, Supplemental File 1E–F). Retinoate (i.e. retinoic acid) was decreased in relative abundance in DPE mouse brain (DPE: 5.4 ± 0.7 uM, Control: 7.7 ± 0.4 uM; t-test, t=2.85, p=0.0079 uncorrected; Figure 3), suggesting that the overall direction of change in retinol metabolism may have been. downward.
Figure 3.

Descriptive analysis of relative abundance (by fold change from control) of metabolites of interest found in retinol metabolism and tryptophan metabolism pathways. Two metabolites were identified in each of these pathways by abundance analysis. Retinoate (i.e. retinoic acid) was reduced by 30% in DPE mouse brain relative to controls. Error bars show standard error. * p < 0.05 vs. control.
3.3. Multiomics integration of transcriptome and metabolome.
As a form of cross-validation, we used split-sample transcriptome and metabolome data to generate a set of multi-modally dysregulated pathway clusters. Transcriptome data were previously published and analyzed27. The variance partition method identified 65 genes of interest that were differentially expressed between groups and had >15% of the variance explained by group (Supplemental File 1G). Multimodal integration of these 65 genes of interest with the 116 annotated metabolites of interest identified 184 over-represented KEGG pathways (Supplemental File 1H). These pathways segregated into seven pathway clusters, including dopaminergic synapse and MAP kinase signaling, among others (Figure 4A–B).
Figure 4.
Identification of multi-modal molecular pathways differentially represented in DPE mouse brain using multiomics integration. (A) UMAP components analysis showing seven clusters of molecular pathways dysregulated in DPE mouse brain. (B) A pathway cluster heatmap shows the clusters internally sorted by enrichment score (−log10 of q-value) and arranged from most enriched (top) to least enriched (bottom).
3.4. Perturbagen Analysis.
We compared the split-sample transcriptome data from DPE mice to the iLINCS online database of compound-induced transcriptional changes using perturbagen analysis (Table 1A–B, Supplemental File 1I). Among the primary “concordant” perturbagens (having a similar transcriptional signature as DPE) were trimethoprim (similarity = 0.5459), a folate synthesis inhibitor52; and AG14361 (similarity = 0.5073), an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and apoptosis53,54 (Table 1A). Among the primary “discordant” perturbagens (having the opposite transcriptional signature as DPE) were pelitinib (similarity = −0.5473), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor55; and Brefeldin A (similarity = −0.4512), an inhibitor of vesicle formation and synaptic vesicle recycling56,57 (Table 1B).
Table 1.
Concordant and discordant perturbagens. Perturbagen analysis showed the similarity between the transcriptome profiles of DPE mouse brain tissue (compared to control) and “perturbagen” drugs applied to cell culture (compared to control) from the iLINCS database. Similarity scores are Pearson r values, with larger positive or negative values indicating more correlation between data sets.
| A | ||
|---|---|---|
| Concordant Perturbagen | Similarity | FDR |
| Trimethoprim | 0.5459 | 2.09×10−8 |
| Erlotinib | 0.5145 | 4.89×10−7 |
| AG 14361 | 0.5073 | 7.13×10−7 |
| Levosalbutamol | 0.4975 | 1.44×10−6 |
| Betahistine | 0.4889 | 2.95×10−6 |
| B | ||
| Discordant Perturbagen | Similarity | FDR |
| Pelitinib | −0.5473 | 2.09×10−8 |
| CHEMBL2143628 | −0.5061 | 7.13×10−7 |
| Brefeldin A | −0.4512 | 3.48×10−5 |
| IM-12 | −0.4398 | 5.96×10−5 |
| Sorafenib | −0.4423 | 7.55×10−5 |
Significance is reported as FDR-corrected q values. (A) Concordant perturbagens with a positively correlated transcriptome profile. (B) Discordant perturbagens with a negatively correlated transcriptome profile.
4. Discussion:
Adult mice exposed during development to low levels of deltamethrin showed a pattern of altered small molecule metabolites in three key metabolic pathways in whole brain. Compared to vehicle-exposed controls, DPE mice showed altered folate biosynthesis, a process that is particularly critical during neurodevelopment for preventing neural tube defects. Additionally, the whole-brain transcriptional profile of adult DPE mice showed a high similarity to the transcriptional profile associated with trimethoprim, a drug that inhibits folate synthesis. These results suggest a multi-modal effect of pyrethroid exposure during development on subsequent adult folate metabolism at the whole-brain level. DPE mice also had altered retinol and tryptophan metabolism, two processes related to circadian rhythms, in line with other research showing reduced whole-brain gene transcription of clock genes in DPE mice33. DPE mouse brain had reduced retinoic acid concentration as compared to controls, suggesting that retinoic acid signaling and metabolism may be decreased. Additionally, multiomics integration of metabolome and transcriptome revealed altered molecular pathways for dopaminergic synapses, validating these findings against prior literature on dopamine dysfunction in DPE mice20,25. This is the first study using an unbiased metabolomics approach to identify effects of DPE on the brain in need of further investigation in future hypothesis-driven studies.
Although specific exposure levels in blood and tissues of pregnant mice were not measured, other studies provide context. For example, in adult rats, a 1 mg/kg dose of deltamethrin resulted in a serum concentration of 56 ng/mL58, with human models predicting double these levels59. Comparatively, pregnant mice exposed to 1.5 mg/kg permethrin had serum concentrations of 260 ng/mL39. Deltamethrin levels in the general population in Beijing ranged from 0 to 17.34 ng/mL60, while pregnant Chinese women had an average level of 39 ng/mL61. In the US, urinary metabolite levels increased from 0.292 ng/mL in 1999–200062 to 660 ng/mL in 2011–201263. These statistics suggest that our chosen exposure dose may represent an above-average exposure, but one which importantly falls below the currently established developmental no observable adverse effect level37 and the EPA-set benchmark dose19.
Folate is critical for early neural development and is universally recognized as a key prenatal vitamin for the prevention of neural tube defects. Prenatal folate supplementation in humans decreases the risk for autism, developmental delay, and other NDDs64,65, and mouse models of maternal folate deficiency consistently show increases in neural tube defects and tumor risk66,67. Additionally, high-dose prenatal folate supplementation in humans may be protective against the increased risk for NDDs contributed by pyrethroid pesticide exposure68. In our study, male mice exposed to deltamethrin during development showed altered folate metabolism in the brain in adulthood. Trimethoprim, a folate synthesis inhibitor, was also the most significant hit in our concordant perturbagen analysis, which compared transcriptomic profiles of gene expression between the iLINCS database of drug effects on cell culture, and split samples of whole brain from our mouse subjects. The effect of DPE on adult folate metabolism and folate-relevant transcriptomic profile in the mouse brain may represent a primary cause of the effects of DPE on NDD-relevant behaviors25 and on NDD-relevant molecular pathways for synaptic plasticity33. Folate is also a precursor in dopamine biosynthesis, which may explain the altered multiomic pathways for dopaminergic synapses, as well as previous findings of broad changes in the dopamine system in DPE mice20,25.
Perturbagen analysis also identified Brefeldin A, an inhibitor of vesicle formation and synaptic release, as having a highly dissimilar transcriptome profile to that of the DPE mouse brain. Multiomics analysis also showed alterations in metabolic and transcriptional pathways for “dopamine synapse,” and previous findings have highlighted hyperactive dopamine signaling in the striatum of DPE mice20,25. Therefore, this discordant profile may reflect a broad increase in synaptic dopamine release in DPE mouse brain. The most highly dissimilar transcriptomic profile to DPE was Pelitinib, an EGFR inhibitor; potentially suggesting a relative increase in growth factor signaling in DPE mouse brains. This would synergize with the relative similarity of the transcriptomic profile of AG14361, an inhibitor of apoptosis-related mTOR signaling. However, the presence of an EGFR inhibitor (Erlotinib) on the concordant perturbagen list as well makes this finding difficult to interpret.
Tryptophan metabolism was also altered in the brains of adult DPE mice. Tryptophan is an essential amino acid and is metabolized along two metabolic pathways: a small amount of tryptophan is metabolized via the methoxyindole pathway, which produces serotonin and melatonin; while the majority of tryptophan is metabolized via the kynurenine pathway, which regulates immune response and is considered neuroprotective69,70. Placental tryptophan metabolism is an essential source of serotonin in fetal neurodevelopment71–73, and disruptions in serotonin signaling during fetal brain development cause a wide range of neural defects74. The kynurenine pathway generates two compounds, kynurenic acid and quinolinic acid, and disruptions in both of these compounds have been associated with NDDs and autism75. Furthermore, acute deltamethrin exposure in rats decreases kynurenic acid production by 31%, suggesting that deltamethrin may have a direct effect on this pathway76.
Both altered retinol metabolism and altered melatonin (via tryptophan metabolism) in DPE mouse brains may provide links between DPE and altered circadian rhythms. DPE mice show reduced transcription of critical clock genes at the whole-brain level33. During development, retinoids play a key role in neuronal differentiation, neural tube development, and neurite outgrowth77. In adulthood, retinol metabolism and retinoic acid are critical for the regulation of both circadian and seasonal rhythms78. Melatonin also plays an essential role in circadian rhythms in the brain and is one of the most reliable markers of the sleep-wake cycle79. Disruption of circadian rhythms and sleep are among the most common comorbidities in developmental disorders80,81. Retinoic acid is also highly expressed in the dopamine system and is a key regulator of dopamine synthesis and signaling82,83, both of which are disrupted in DPE mice20,25. Finally, retinoic acid is also critical to adult neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity84–86, and alterations related to these two processes were detected by both kinomic and transcriptomic analysis of these same brains27. Thus, our non-biased metabolomics study adds to the literature highlighting retinol and tryptophan metabolism as worthy targets for future investigations into the long-term effects of developmental pyrethroid exposure.
Multiomics integration of metabolome and transcriptome served to validate and reinforce these findings against prior literature. The most enriched cluster of molecular pathways in the integrated data set was ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, a critical mechanism of autophagy and apoptosis. Perturbagen analysis of the transcriptome also found the mTOR inhibitor AG14361 to have a similar transcriptional profile to DPE, suggesting a decrease in apoptosis-related transcription. Apoptotic pathways were also prominent in the kinomics analysis from these same subjects33, where it appeared that cellular growth was upregulated and apoptosis downregulated. Changes in the mitogen-associated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway were also detected in kinomics analysis, where it appeared that both extracellular signaling kinase (ERK) and rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) kinase activity was upregulated by DPE. The dopaminergic synapse cluster of pathways also validates these findings against prior literature showing alterations of dopamine, dopamine receptors, dopamine transporter, and dopamine release dynamics in low-dose DPE in mice20,25.
There are key strengths and limitations to this study that must be considered. A significant limitation of this study is its use of a single exposure dose of deltamethrin, selected based on previous research and significantly below both regulatory benchmark doses and developmental no observable adverse effect levels20,25,33. A careful look at dose and the dose-dependent effects of DPE is a critical next step. Another limitation of this study is the use of whole-brain tissue as the level of analysis. We chose to analyze whole brain because pyrethroid pesticides readily penetrate all regions of the brain and cross the placenta into the embryo following acute oral exposure in mice38,87. Therefore, examining whole-brain tissue strengthens our ability to see metabolic effects permeating every brain region and dominant cell type, which are also the most likely to be good targets for oral pharmacological treatment. However, more specific effects on individual brain regions or minority cell types are unlikely to be represented in our data and are an important future direction. Based on the DPE phenotype in mouse of hyperactivity, repetitive behaviors, and cognitive deficits, a primary effect on prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and striatum might be predicted; and effects on circadian rhythm molecular pathways directly implicate the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Finally, our study looked at the effects of DPE exclusively on male mouse brains. This decision was primarily driven by the male-biased effects of DPE in prior studies in mice20,25, suggesting that the largest changes would be expected in male mouse brains. However, as a consequence, this study cannot contribute to the larger literature on male-biased sensitivity to neurotoxicants because it lacks a female comparison. Including female subjects in future studies would allow us to see sex-dependent changes in brain metabolism and further identify the root causes of the male bias in the changes in NDD-relevant behaviors in DPE mice.
4.1. Conclusions.
Pyrethroid pesticides are among the most commonly used in the US, and the exposure level of the general public is high. If developmental exposure to pyrethroid pesticides increases risk for autism and other developmental disorders, this represents a critical public health challenge. Here, we used an unbiased approach to show that developmental exposure to a low level of deltamethrin in mice caused changes in brain metabolism related to folate, tryptophan, and retinol metabolism, which are strongly related to developmental disorders in humans. We also showed that the transcriptomic profile resulting from developmental pyrethroid exposure resembles the action of folate-related drugs; and that multiomics integration of these two datasets identifies molecular pathways for dopamine signaling, proteolysis, and MAPK signaling. Much work remains to verify these findings using specific targeted methods, which may point to potential avenues for prevention and treatment.
Supplementary Material
Figure 2.
Metabolite pathway analysis. Pathway analysis on the 116 annotated metabolites of interest was used to map the metabolites to metabolic pathways. Pathways were evaluated by statistical significance (p-value) and the enrichment of metabolites in the pathway (pathway impact). Dashed horizontal lines show the cutoff values for raw p < 0.05, and p < 0.05 after adjustment for false discovery rate.
Highlights.
Developmental pyrethroid exposure disrupts brain metabolism in adulthood
Exposure disrupts metabolic pathways for folate, retinol, and tryptophan
Exposure disrupts genetic and metabolic pathways for dopamine signaling
Acknowledgements:
We gratefully acknowledge the Emory University HERCULES High Resolution Metabolomics Core, and in particular Dr. Dean Jones and Sami Teeny, for their significant assistance with data analysis. We would also like to thank Dr. Sarah Daniel of In Scripto, LLC for comments on this manuscript.
Funding:
This research was supported in part by funding from the NIH to JPB (NIEHS: R00ES027869) and to GWM (NIEHS: R01ES023839). This research was also supported by an award to JPB from the deArce-Koch Memorial Endowment Fund. Fellowship support was provided to WGR by an NIH G-RISE T32 award to The University of Toledo (NIGMS: 1T32GM144873). Funding sources had no involvement in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, manuscript preparation, or article submission decisions.
Footnotes
Declaration of competing interest:
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data statement:
All raw data for metabolomics, including all metadata, are available in the supplementary materials. All sequencing data are available on NCBI GEO (GSE241185).
Bibliography:
- 1.Bloom B., Cohen R. A. & Freeman G. Summary health statistics for US children: National health interview survey, 2010. (2011). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Landrigan P. J., Lambertini L. & Birnbaum L. S. A research strategy to discover the environmental causes of autism and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Environmental health perspectives 120, a258–a260 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Silverman J. L. et al. Reconsidering animal models used to study autism spectrum disorder: Current state and optimizing future. Genes, brain and behavior 21, e12803 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cogswell M. E. et al. Health needs and use of services among children with developmental disabilities—United States, 2014–2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 71, 453 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buxbaum J. D. & Hof P. R. The emerging neuroscience of autism spectrum disorders. Brain research, 1–2 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grandjean P. & Landrigan P. J. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. The lancet neurology 13, 330–338 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huguet G., Ey E. & Bourgeron T. The genetic landscapes of autism spectrum disorders. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 14, 191–213 (2013). 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Herbert M. R. Contributions of the environment and environmentally vulnerable physiology to autism spectrum disorders. Current opinion in neurology 23, 103–110 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shelton J. F., Hertz-Picciotto I. & Pessah I. N. Tipping the Balance of Autism Risk: Potential Mechanisms Linking Pesticides and Autism. Environmental Health Perspectives 120, 944–951 (2012). 10.1289/ehp.1104553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang C. et al. The association between air pollutants and autism spectrum disorders. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24, 15949–15958 (2017). 10.1007/s11356-017-8928-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saghazadeh A. & Rezaei N. Systematic review and meta-analysis links autism and toxic metals and highlights the impact of country development status: Higher blood and erythrocyte levels for mercury and lead, and higher hair antimony, cadmium, lead, and mercury. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 79, 340–368 (2017). 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Panesar H. K., Kennedy C. L., Keil Stietz K. P. & Lein P. J. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): risk factors for autism spectrum disorder? Toxics 8, 70 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ye B. S., Leung A. O. W. & Wong M. H. The association of environmental toxicants and autism spectrum disorders in children. Environ Pollut 227, 234–242 (2017). 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Witchey S. K. et al. Impacts of Gestational FireMaster 550 (FM 550) Exposure on the Neonatal Cortex are Sex Specific and Largely Attributable to the Organophosphate Esters. Neuroendocrinology (2022). 10.1159/000526959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Messer A. Mini-review: polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants as potential autism risk factors. Physiol Behav 100, 245–249 (2010). 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shelton J. F. et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study. Environmental health perspectives 122, 1103–1109 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Saghazadeh A. & Rezaei N. Systematic review and meta-analysis links autism and toxic metals and highlights the impact of country development status: Higher blood and erythrocyte levels for mercury and lead, and higher hair antimony, cadmium, lead, and mercury. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 79, 340–368 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grandjean P. & Landrigan P. J. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. The Lancet 368, 2167–2178 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.EPA U. Pyrethrins/pyrethroid cumulative risk assessment. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richardson J. R. et al. Developmental pesticide exposure reproduces features of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The FASEB Journal 29, 1960 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wagner-Schuman M. et al. Association of pyrethroid pesticide exposure with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a nationally representative sample of US children. Environmental Health 14, 1–9 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.von Ehrenstein O. S. et al. Prenatal and infant exposure to ambient pesticides and autism spectrum disorder in children: population based case-control study. bmj 364 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hicks S. D., Wang M., Fry K., Doraiswamy V. & Wohlford E. M. Neurodevelopmental delay diagnosis rates are increased in a region with aerial pesticide application. Frontiers in pediatrics 5, 116 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xue Z. et al. Effect of synthetic pyrethroid pesticide exposure during pregnancy on the growth and development of infants. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 25, 72S–79S (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Curtis M. A. et al. Developmental pyrethroid exposure causes a neurodevelopmental disorder phenotype in mice. PNAS Nexus 2, pgad085 (2023). 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Magby J. P. & Richardson J. R. Developmental pyrethroid exposure causes long-term decreases of neuronal sodium channel expression. Neurotoxicology 60, 274–279 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nguyen J. Developmental pyrethroid exposure disrupts molecular pathways for circadian rhythms and synaptic plasticity in mouse brain. (2023). 10.1101/2023.08.28.555113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Armstrong L. E. et al. Effects of developmental deltamethrin exposure on white adipose tissue gene expression. Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology 27, 165–171 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hossain M. M., Belkadi A., Al-Haddad S. & Richardson J. R. Deltamethrin exposure inhibits adult hippocampal neurogenesis and causes deficits in learning and memory in mice. Toxicological Sciences 178, 347–357 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hossain M. M., DiCicco-Bloom E. & Richardson J. R. Hippocampal ER stress and learning deficits following repeated pyrethroid exposure. Toxicological Sciences 143, 220–228 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vester A. I., Chen M., Marsit C. J. & Caudle W. M. A neurodevelopmental model of combined pyrethroid and chronic stress exposure. Toxics 7, 24 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vester A. I. et al. Combined neurodevelopmental exposure to deltamethrin and corticosterone is associated with Nr3c1 hypermethylation in the midbrain of male mice. Neurotoxicology and teratology 80, 106887 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nguyen J. H. et al. Developmental pyrethroid exposure disrupts molecular pathways for circadian rhythms and synaptic plasticity in mouse brain. bioRxiv (2023). 10.1101/2023.08.28.555113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wishart D. S. Metabolomics for Investigating Physiological and Pathophysiological Processes. Physiol Rev 99, 1819–1875 (2019). 10.1152/physrev.00035.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim S. J., Song H. E., Lee H. Y. & Yoo H. J. Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics in Translational Research. Adv Exp Med Biol 1310, 509–531 (2021). 10.1007/978-981-33-6064-8_19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Alseekh S. et al. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: a guide for annotation, quantification and best reporting practices. Nat Methods 18, 747–756 (2021). 10.1038/s41592-021-01197-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kavlock R. et al. Toxicity studies with decamethrin, a synthetic pyrethroid insecticide. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 2, 751–765 (1979). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Anadon A. et al. Toxicokinetics of deltamethrin and its 4’-HO-metabolite in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 141, 8–16 (1996). 10.1006/taap.1996.0254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Elser B. A., Simonsen D., Lehmler H. J. & Stevens H. E. Maternal and fetal tissue distribution of alpha-cypermethrin and permethrin in pregnant CD-1 mice. Environ Adv 8 (2022). 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Uppal K. et al. xMSanalyzer: automated pipeline for improved feature detection and downstream analysis of large-scale, non-targeted metabolomics data. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 15 (2013). 10.1186/1471-2105-14-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Uppal K., Walker D. I. & Jones D. P. xMSannotator: An R Package for Network-Based Annotation of High-Resolution Metabolomics Data. Anal Chem 89, 1063–1067 (2017). 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.xmsPANDA: R Package for Biomarker Discovery, Network, and Data Exploratory Analysis (2021).
- 43.Lu Y., Pang Z. & Xia J. Comprehensive investigation of pathway enrichment methods for functional interpretation of LC-MS global metabolomics data. Brief Bioinform 24 (2023). 10.1093/bib/bbac553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pang Z. et al. Using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 for LC-HRMS spectra processing, multi-omics integration and covariate adjustment of global metabolomics data. Nat Protoc 17, 1735–1761 (2022). 10.1038/s41596-022-00710-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kim D., Paggi J. M., Park C., Bennett C. & Salzberg S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 37, 907–915 (2019). 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lawrence M. et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput Biol 9, e1003118 (2013). 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Love M. I., Huber W. & Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15, 550 (2014). 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hoffman G. E. & Schadt E. E. variancePartition: interpreting drivers of variation in complex gene expression studies. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 483 (2016). 10.1186/s12859-016-1323-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.drugfindR.
- 50.Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ryan W. G. willgryan/PAVER: Pre-release to generate DOI (pre-release), 2023). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Meidahl Petersen K. et al. The Effect of Trimethoprim on Serum Folate Levels in Humans: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Ther 23, e382–387 (2016). 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ethier C., Tardif M., Arul L. & Poirier G. G. PARP-1 modulation of mTOR signaling in response to a DNA alkylating agent. PLoS One 7, e47978 (2012). 10.1371/journal.pone.0047978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Du X. et al. The Effect of Endogenous PARP-1 in Different Phases of IL-1beta-Induced Chondrocyte Degeneration. Altern Ther Health Med 29, 410–416 (2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Roskoski R. Jr. Small molecule inhibitors targeting the EGFR/ErbB family of protein-tyrosine kinases in human cancers. Pharmacol Res 139, 395–411 (2019). 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Klausner R. D., Donaldson J. G. & Lippincott-Schwartz J. Brefeldin A: insights into the control of membrane traffic and organelle structure. J Cell Biol 116, 1071–1080 (1992). 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mundigl O. et al. Synaptic vesicle proteins and early endosomes in cultured hippocampal neurons: differential effects of Brefeldin A in axon and dendrites. J Cell Biol 122, 1207–1221 (1993). 10.1083/jcb.122.6.1207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hughes M. F. et al. Environmentally relevant pyrethroid mixtures: A study on the correlation of blood and brain concentrations of a mixture of pyrethroid insecticides to motor activity in the rat. Toxicology 359–360, 19–28 (2016). 10.1016/j.tox.2016.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mallick P. et al. Development and Application of a Life-Stage Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model to the Assessment of Internal Dose of Pyrethroids in Humans. Toxicol Sci 173, 86–99 (2020). 10.1093/toxsci/kfz211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li J., Wang P., Shi S. & Xue J. Background biomonitoring of residue levels of 137 pesticides in the blood plasma of the general population in Beijing. Environ Monit Assess 190, 315 (2018). 10.1007/s10661-018-6694-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Simaremare S. R. S., Hung C. C., Hsieh C. J. & Yiin L. M. Relationship between Organophosphate and Pyrethroid Insecticides in Blood and Their Metabolites in Urine: A Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17 (2019). 10.3390/ijerph17010034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Barr D. B. et al. Urinary concentrations of metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides in the general U.S. population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. Environ Health Perspect 118, 742–748 (2010). 10.1289/ehp.0901275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lehmler H. J., Simonsen D., Liu B. & Bao W. Environmental exposure to pyrethroid pesticides in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults and children: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2012. Environ Pollut 267, 115489 (2020). 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Schmidt R. J. et al. Maternal periconceptional folic acid intake and risk of autism spectrum disorders and developmental delay in the CHARGE (CHildhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment) case-control study. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 80–89 (2012). 10.3945/ajcn.110.004416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Suren P. et al. Association between maternal use of folic acid supplements and risk of autism spectrum disorders in children. JAMA 309, 570–577 (2013). 10.1001/jama.2012.155925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Denny K. J. et al. Autoantibodies against homocysteinylated protein in a mouse model of folate deficiency-induced neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 106, 201–207 (2016). 10.1002/bdra.23483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kawakubo-Yasukochi T. et al. Maternal folic acid depletion during early pregnancy increases sensitivity to squamous tumor formation in the offspring in mice. J Dev Orig Health Dis 10, 683–691 (2019). 10.1017/S2040174419000217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schmidt R. J. et al. Combined Prenatal Pesticide Exposure and Folic Acid Intake in Relation to Autism Spectrum Disorder. Environ Health Perspect 125, 097007 (2017). 10.1289/EHP604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Williams M. et al. Maternal inflammation results in altered tryptophan metabolism in rabbit placenta and fetal brain. Developmental neuroscience 39, 399–412 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Platten M., Nollen E. A. A., Rohrig U. F., Fallarino F. & Opitz C. A. Tryptophan metabolism as a common therapeutic target in cancer, neurodegeneration and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18, 379–401 (2019). 10.1038/s41573-019-0016-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bonnin A. & Levitt P. Fetal, maternal, and placental sources of serotonin and new implications for developmental programming of the brain. Neuroscience 197, 1–7 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bonnin A. & Levitt P. Placental source for 5-HT that tunes fetal brain development. Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 299 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gaspar P., Cases O. & Maroteaux L. The developmental role of serotonin: news from mouse molecular genetics. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4, 1002–1012 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Goeden N., Velasquez J. C. & Bonnin A. Placental tryptophan metabolism as a potential novel pathway for the developmental origins of mental diseases. Translational Developmental Psychiatry 1, 20593 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schwartz C. E. Aberrant tryptophan metabolism: the unifying biochemical basis for autism spectrum disorders? Biomarkers in medicine 8, 313–315 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zielinska E. et al. Effect of pesticides kynurenic acid production in rat brain slices. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 12, 177–179 (2005). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.D’Ambrosio D. N., Clugston R. D. & Blaner W. S. Vitamin A metabolism: an update. Nutrients 3, 63–103 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ransom J., Morgan P. J., McCaffery P. J. & Stoney P. N. The rhythm of retinoids in the brain. J Neurochem 129, 366–376 (2014). 10.1111/jnc.12620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Cajochen C., Krauchi K. & Wirz-Justice A. Role of melatonin in the regulation of human circadian rhythms and sleep. J Neuroendocrinol 15, 432–437 (2003). 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2003.00989.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Logan R. W. & McClung C. A. Rhythms of life: circadian disruption and brain disorders across the lifespan. Nat Rev Neurosci 20, 49–65 (2019). 10.1038/s41583-018-0088-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Glickman G. Circadian rhythms and sleep in children with autism. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34, 755–768 (2010). 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.McCaffery P. & Drager U. C. High levels of a retinoic acid-generating dehydrogenase in the meso-telencephalic dopamine system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 7772–7776 (1994). 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Samad T. A., Krezel W., Chambon P. & Borrelli E. Regulation of dopaminergic pathways by retinoids: activation of the D2 receptor promoter by members of the retinoic acid receptor-retinoid X receptor family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 14349–14354 (1997). 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Jacobs S. et al. Retinoic acid is required early during adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 3902–3907 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0511294103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.McCaffery P., Zhang J. & Crandall J. E. Retinoic acid signaling and function in the adult hippocampus. J Neurobiol 66, 780–791 (2006). 10.1002/neu.20237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Misner D. L. et al. Vitamin A deprivation results in reversible loss of hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 11714–11719 (2001). 10.1073/pnas.191369798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Soderlund D. M. et al. Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology 171, 3–59 (2002). 10.1016/s0300-483x(01)00569-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All raw data for metabolomics, including all metadata, are available in the supplementary materials. All sequencing data are available on NCBI GEO (GSE241185).



