Table 1. Summary of techniques developed to measure required tibial tuberosity advancement for traditional TTA and TTAT and supporting evidence.
Methods included in this study are highlighted.
| Technique | Year | Authors | Further supporting evidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional method | 2002 | Montavon et al. | Millet et al. (2013); Pillard et al. (2016) | Conventional method vs. CT Conventional method vs. correction method |
| Common Tangent Method | 2006 | Dennler et al. | Millet et al. (2013); | Conventional method vs. CT |
| Correction method | 2011 | Etchepareborde et al. | Pillard et al. (2016) | Conventional method vs. correction method |
| Bielecki method | 2014 | Bielecki et al. | - | |
| modified TTA planning method | 2015 | Kapler et al. | - | |
| Tibial Anatomy-based Method | 2016 | Ness et al. | Kapler et al. (2015) | modified TTA planning method vs. TAM |
| Osteotomy axis method | 2017 | Pillard et al. | - | |
| Margo Cranialis method | 2022 | Koch et al. | - | |
| 2,1 method | 2022 | Koch et al. | - |