Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 12;41(12):1641–1655. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3

Table 2.

Economically justifiable price at target WTP of CHF100 000/QALY

Treatment Discount level of pack prices Costs (CHF) QALYs ΔCosts (CHF) ΔQALYs Comment ICERs (CHF/QALY gained) Total drug costs (CHF)
Overall population (carboplatin)
For Nivo and Ipi
Pem+Platin 69,345 1.20 12,442
Nivo+Ipi −52% (to 48%) 125,132 1.76 55,787 0.56 Cost effective at WTP vs Pem+Platin 99,128 58,707
Pem+Platin+Beva 163,441 1.56 38,309 −0.20 Absolutely dominated 92,937
For bevacizumab
Pem+Platin 76,138 1.20 19,235
Pem+Platin+Beva −72% (to 28%) 112,099 1.56 35,961 0.36 Cost effective at WTP vs Pem+Platin 99,928 41,595
Epithelioid population (carboplatin)
For Nivo and Ipi
Pem+Platin 68,578 1.44 10,001
Nivo+Ipi −73% (to 27%) 99,606 1.75 31,028 0.32 Cost effective at WTP 97,877 33,517
Pem+Platin+Beva 205,983 1.95 106,377 0.20 541,636 128,999
For bevacizumab
Pem+Platin 78,693 1.44 20,116
Pem+Platin+Beva −72% (to 28%) 129,529 1.95 50,837 0.51 99,017 52,546
Nivo+Ipi 180,101 1.75 50,572 −0.20 Absolutely dominated 114,013

Beva bevacizumab, CHF Swiss Francs, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ipi ipilimumab, nivo nivolumab, pem pemetrexed, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, WTP willingness-to-pay