Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 11;13(11):e3250. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3250

TABLE 2.

Statistical comparisons of neuroimaging metrics between FTD patients versus healthy controls and post hoc comparisons among subject subgroups.

One‐way ANOVA (omnibus test, main effect: “diagnosis”)
Left hemisphere Right hemisphere
F‐value (DOF), p‐value Significant pairwise contrasts (post hoc) [p‐value] F‐value (DOF), p‐value Significant pairwise contrasts (post hoc) [p‐value]
Cortical thickness
Broca's area F(6, 286) = 23.90, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSnci [p adj = .003]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. bvFTD [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj = .012]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .023]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. bvFTD [p adj = .032]

‐ ALSnci vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

F(6, 286) = 23.87, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSnci [p adj = .002]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. bvFTD [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj = .03]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .014]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. bvFTD [p adj = .010]

‐ ALSnci vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

Wernicke's area F(6, 286) = 13.22, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .005]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .006]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .035]

‐ bvFTD vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .033]

F(6, 286) = 9.10, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSnci [p adj = .023]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .010]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. bvFTD [p adj = .020]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .004]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .007]

Structural connectivity: Frontal aslant tract (FAT)
FA F(6, 271) = 6.05, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .030]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .012]

‐ ALSnci vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .036]

F(6, 271) = 5.78, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .023]

RD F(6, 271) = 12.99, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .023]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .017]

‐ ALSnci vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .017]

‐ nfvPPA vs. bvFTD [p adj < .001]

F(6, 271) = 11.95, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .011]

‐ HC vs. bvFTD [p adj = .0281]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .016]

‐ ALSnci vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .002]

Structural connectivity: Arcuate fascicle (AF)
FA F(6, 282) = 5.50, p < .001* ‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .006] F(6, 282) = 2.38, p = .03*
RD F(6, 271) = 21.85, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .003]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj = .012]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .032]

‐ ALSnci vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. svPPA [p adj = .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9+ vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .013]

‐ bvFTD vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .008]

F(6, 282) = 9.89, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

Structural connectivity: Inferior occipitofrontal fascicle (IFO)
FA F(6, 281) = 0.76, p = .60 NA F(6, 280) = 1.13, p = .35 NA
RD F(6, 281) = 9.35, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .028]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .018]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj = .003]

‐ ALSnci vs. svPPA [p adj = .026]

F(6, 280) = 14.48, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .001]

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj = .005]

‐ HC vs. bvFTD [p adj = .030]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .010]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj = .003]

‐ ALSnci vs. svPPA [p adj = .005]

Structural connectivity: Inferior longitudinal fascicle (ILF)
FA F(6, 278) = 0.70, p = .65 NA F(6, 272) = 0.85, p = .53 NA
RD F(6, 278) = 9.34, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9+ vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ bvFTD vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ nfvPPA vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

F(6, 272) = 10.76, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .045]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .046]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. svPPA [p adj = .007]

‐ ALSFTD_C9+ vs. svPPA [p adj = .012]

‐ bvFTD vs. svPPA [p adj = .031]

Structural connectivity: Superior longitudinal fascicle (SLF)
FA F(6, 282) = 8.40, p = .04*

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. nfvPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .002]

F(6, 281) = 8.77, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. ALSFTD_C9+ [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9+ vs. bvFTD [p adj = .050]

‐ ALSFTD_C9+ vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .023]

RD F(6, 282) = 2.24, p < .001* F(6, 281) = 3.57, p = .002*
Structural connectivity: Uncinate fascicle (UF)
FA F(6, 270) = 1.08, p = .37 NA F(6, 273) = 3.16, p = .005*
RD F(6, 270) = 12.02, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. nfvPPA [p adj = .029]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj = .010]

‐ ALSnci vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. svPPA [p adj = .041]

‐ ALSFTD_C9+ vs. svPPA [p adj = .003]

‐ bvFTD vs. svPPA [p adj = .029]

F(6, 273) = 21.43, p < .001*

‐ HC vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. bvFTD [p adj < .001]

‐ HC vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. ALSFTD_C9– [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSnci vs. bvFTD [p adj = .006]

‐ ALSnci vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9– vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ ALSFTD_C9+ vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ bvFTD vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

‐ nfvPPA vs. svPPA [p adj < .001]

Functional connectivity
Broca–Wernicke FC F(6, 261) = 1.71, p = .12 NA F(6, 261) = 1.22, p = .30 NA
Aslant tract FC F(6, 261) = 3.41, p = .003* ‐ HC vs. ALSnci [p adj = .001] F(6, 261) = 1.54, p = .17 NA

Note: The symbol “–” represents that post hoc testing yielded no significant pairwise comparisons despite the overall significant ANOVA omnibus test.

Abbreviations: adj, adjusted; AI, artificial intelligence; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFTDC9–(+), (non)carriers of the hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9orf72; ALSnci, noncognitively impaired ALS; ANOVA, analysis of variance; bvFTD, behavioral variant FTD; DOF, degrees of freedom; DWI, diffusion‐weighted imaging; FA, fractional anisotropy; FC, functional connectivity; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; HC, healthy control; HSD, honest significant difference; NA, not applicable (here, ANOVA omnibus test was not significant and therefore post hoc testing was not justified); nfvPPA, nonfluent variant PPA; PPA, primary progressive aphasia; RD, radial diffusivity; rs‐fMRI, resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging; svPPA, semantic variant PPA; T1w, T1‐weighted.

*Significant at an alpha level of p ≤ .05.