Table 2.
Preliminary data items to extract from regulatory guidelines, viewpoints, expert group recommendations, and other similar sources.
| Data items | Explanation | ||
| Publication details | |||
|
|
Authors and reference | Who wrote the paper? Include the reference. | |
|
|
Year | When was the paper published? | |
|
|
Type of source | In what type of literature was the paper published (journal, conference, gray literature—conference, thesis or dissertation, clinical trials registry platform, white paper, academic and industry report, opinion paper, blog or website or forum post, letter, guideline, book chapter, editorial, commentary, paper or guideline by expert group, regulatory entity, or others)? | |
|
|
Country or region | In which country or region was the paper written? To which regions do the recommendations apply (which country or region, global)? | |
| General details | |||
|
|
Sampling size | What is the recommended or used sample size? | |
|
|
Sampling method | What method is recommended or used for sampling? | |
|
|
Study design | What study design is recommended or used for clinical validation? | |
| Digital endpoint details | |||
|
|
Clinical application of digital endpoints | What is the clinical application of digital endpoints (diagnostic, safety, response, monitoring, prognostic, risk, or predictive)? | |
|
|
Type of validation methods | Which type of validation method is recommended? The trial, simulation, expert opinion, model-centered, and other? | |
|
|
Analytical methods | What methods are recommended to measure the relationship between clinically relevant outcomes and digital endpoints? What association measures should be used? | |
|
|
Analytical methods | Is there any consideration for using the digital endpoint as a primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoint? | |