Table 2.
One-way ANOVA for the 4 versions of the study generated by AI.
| Research components and source | Sum of squares | Mean of squares | df | F 3,88 | P value | Least significant difference | |||||||||
| Abstract |
|
|
|
3.59 | .02 | Version 3 and version 4>version 1 |
|
||||||||
|
|
BGa | 3.77 | 1.26 | 3 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| WGb | 30.78 | 0.35 | 88 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 34.55 | N/Ac | 91 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Research idea |
|
|
|
9.06 | <.001 | Version 4>version 1, version 2, and version 3 |
|
||||||||
|
|
BG | 3.65 | 1.22 | 3 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| WG | 11.80 | 0.13 | 88 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 15.45 | N/A | 91 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Literature review |
|
|
|
35.27 | <.001 | Version 1<version 2<version 3<version 4 |
|
||||||||
|
|
BG | 25.19 | 8.40 | 3 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| WG | 20.95 | 0.24 | 88 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 46.14 | N/A | 91 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Methodology |
|
|
|
30.85 | <.001 | Version 1<version 2<version 3<version 4 |
|
||||||||
|
|
BG | 24.92 | 8.31 | 3 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| WG | 23.70 | 0.27 | 88 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 48.62 | N/A | 91 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Citation and references |
|
|
|
10.90 | <.001 | Version 1<version 2<version 3=version 4 | |||||||||
|
|
BG | 10.68 | 3.56 | 3 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| WG | 28.74 | 0.33 | 88 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 39.42 | N/A | 91 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Plagiarism |
|
|
|
53.36 | <.001 | (Version 1 and version 2)<version 3=version 4 |
|
||||||||
|
|
BG | 20.88 | 6.96 | 3 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| WG | 11.48 | 0.13 | 88 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 32.36 | N/A | 91 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
|
|
|
76.90 | <.001 | Version 1<version 2<version 3<version 4 |
|
||||||||
|
|
BG | 11.48 | 3.83 | 3 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| WG | 4.38 | 0.05 | 88 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 15.86 | N/A | 91 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
aBG: between groups.
bWG: within the group.
cN/A: not applicable.