Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 9;23:823. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05324-4

Table 3.

Child Behavioral Checklist, comparing the probiotic and control group results at baseline and follow-up measurements

CBCL Parent Form (Raw score) Probiotics (N = 36) Control (N = 40) p- Value(M)
Before After p-Value(W) Before After p- Value(W)
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD d Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD d
Syndrome scale (Internalizing) 17 ± 1.3 14 ± 6 -3.1 ± 6.31 0.006* 0.62 16.5 ± 2.3 15.7 ± 2 -0.7 ± 2.7 0.064 0.41 0.007*
Syndrome scale (Externalizing) 18.14 ± 2.4 15.31 ± 3.6 -2.83 ± 4.5 0.001* 0.71 17.8 ± 3.4 17.2 ± 3 -0.6 ± 3 0.209 0.3 0.007*
Total Score 57.8 ± 3.4 53 ± 9.6 -5 ± 9.3 0.002* 0.70 58.8 ± 3.4 57.7 ± 3.5 -1.13 ± 4.23 0.072 0.40 0.007*
CBCL Parent Form (T score)
 Syndrome scale (Internalizing) 68.83 ± 2.3 66 ± 4.5 -2.8 ± 4.2 0.001* 0.74 68.5 ± 2 68 ± 2.2 -0.6 ± 2.7 0.055 0.43 0.014*
 Syndrome scale (Externalizing) 69.6 ± 3.5 66.5 ± 4.3 -3.11 ± 4.7  < 0.001* 0.85 69.25 ± 3.3 68.6 ± 4 -0.67 ± 3.3 0.556 0.13 0.002*
 Total Score 67.8 ± 6.6 62.7 ± 4.8 -5 ± 7.8 0.001* 0.71 68 ± 6 65.8 ± 6 -2.2 ± 8 0.0.82 0.40 0.024*

CBCL Child Behavioral Checklist

(W)Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Before vs. after comparison for each group separately), ∆ (After minus Before, (M) Mann–Whitney U-test (∆ comparison between the groups),*p < 0.05; d, The Cohen’s d effect size