Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 9;22:311. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02038-5

Table 3.

Beta between ePWV by TyG index in the NHANES 1999–2018

Variables Beta (95% CI) P value
TyG index
 Unadjusted 0.08 (0.01, 0.15) 0.028
 Model 1 − 0.03 (− 0.07, 0.00) 0.059
 Model 2 0.04 (0.00, 0.08) 0.039
HOMA-IR
 Unadjusted − 0.01 (− 0.02, − 0.01)  < 0.001
 Model 1 − 0.01 (− 0.01, − 0.00)  < 0.001
 Model 2 − 0.00 (− 0.00, 0.00) 0.103
HOMA-IS
 Unadjusted 0.21 (0.13, 0.29)  < 0.001
 Model 1 0.10 (0.07, 0.14)  < 0.001
 Model 2 0.03 (− 0.01, 0.07) 0.163

Model 1: Adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male or female), race (Mexican American, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, Other Hispanic, or Other Race), education (less than high school, high school, or more than high school), PIR grade (continuous)

Model 2: Further adjusted for body mass index (continuous), MET (continuous), smoking status (never, former, or current), alcohol consumption (never, former, mild, moderate, or heavy), diabetes (no or yes), hyperlipidemia (no or yes), cardiovascular disease (no or yes), chronic kidney disease (no or yes), anti-hypertensive agents (no or yes), anti-diabetic agents (no or yes), anti-hyperlipidemia agents (no or yes)