Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 3;2014(3):CD010813. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010813.pub2

12. Results of sensitivity analyses.

  Source of bias and No of studies
Generation ofprogestogen Industry (n=8) Non‐industry (n=9) Cohort study (n=8) Case‐control (n=15) Objectively confirmedvenous thrombosis (n=5) Subjectively confirmedvenous thrombosis (n=11)
Non‐use 1 1 1 1 1 1
1st 2.6 (0.9‐7.4) 3.3 (2.4‐4.6) 2.0 (0.4‐10.5) 3.3 (2.3‐4.7) 4.5 (3.2‐6.5) 2.6 (1.3‐5.3)
2nd 2.1 (1.0‐4.8) 3.1 (2.5‐3.8) 1.7 (0.4‐8.0) 2.9 (2.3‐3.7) 3.3 (2.8‐4.0) 2.5 (1.4‐4.5)
3rd 1.9 (0.8‐4.2) 5.2 (4.2‐6.5) 2.0 (0.5‐8.6) 4.2 (3.3‐5.3) 6.2 (5.2‐7.4) 3.0 (1.7‐5.4)
  Data are relative risk (95% confidence interval) of venous thrombosis