Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 28;10(4):343–349. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00926

Table 1. Mass Balance of Total Fluorine for Eight Products Analyzed by PIGE and Targeted Analysis of Extracts before and after Storage for 2 Years, and after Hydrolysis Assaya.

Sample name Burrito molded bowl 1 Burrito molded bowl 2 Salad molded bowl 3 Donut paper bag 4 Pastry paper bag 5 Pastry paper bag 6 Popcorn paper bag 7 Popcorn paper bag 8
PIGE                
Concentration 1 300 000 1 010 000 1 180 000 30 100 23 800 28 000 11 400 <LOQ
Original Targeted Analysis                
Concentration (original extraction) 283 569 328 181 105 126 109 4.07
Percent of PIGE concentration explained (%) 0.02 0.06 0.03 0.60 0.44 0.45 0.96 N/A
Concentration (re-extraction after 2 years) 395 552 340 31.1 31.0 24.3 45.4 9.30
Percent of PIGE concentration explained (%) 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.10 0.13 0.09 0.40 N/A
Hydrolysis
Concentration 36 100 24 100 65 700 3900 8100 8000 2900 7.00
Difference between hydrolysis and concentration (re-extraction after 2 years) 35 700 23 700 65 400 3860 8000 7960 2860  
Percent of PIGE concentration explained (%) (F from unknown precursors released after hydrolysis) 2.8 2.4 5.6 13 34 28 25 N/A
a

Concentrations of total F analyzed by PIGE and targeted analysis of extracts and after hydrolysis are expressed in μg F/m2. Also included are percentage contributions of the targeted analysis to total F measured by PIGE. The detailed information on conversion for concentration of total F (μg F/m2) from concentration of PFAS (ng/g) for targeted analysis of extracts and after hydrolysis was shown in Section S9. N/A indicates not applicable.