Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 17;15(1):1474704916677342. doi: 10.1177/1474704916677342

Table 2.

Bivariate Correlations Among Environmental Harshness, Health, and LH Strategy Indicators in Study 1 (MTurk Mothers) and Study 2 (Undergraduates).

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. Socioeconomic status  composite −.14* .03 −.09 −.03 .04 −.07 −.08 −.15** −.22** .08 .06
2. Family neglect composite −.39** .48** .36** .37** .06 .51** .60** .61** .44** .18** −.31**
3. Neighborhood crime  composite −.25** .48** .29** .32** .10 .47** .48** .41** .18** .11 −.13*
4. Childhood sickness .01 .09* .03 .33** .09 .27** .39** .38** .29** .11 −.24**
5. Adulthood sickness −.07 .14** .11* .20** −.03 .39** .43** .39** .29** .01 −.28**
6. Health attitude .12** −.22** −.07 −.29** −.46** .08 .12* .10 .01 .02 −.06
7. Paranoia −.13** .25** .31** −.01 .15** −.15** .67** .63** .41** .16** −.25**
8. Depression −.14** .27** .23** .09 .26** −.32** .46** .95** .62** .18** −.27**
9. Anxiety −.18** .28** .22** .07 .25** −.32** .45** .94** .68** .21** −.27**
10. Perceived stress −.11* .25** .13** .06 .16** −.28** .37** .56** .62** .13* −.20**
11. Short-term mating orientation −.10* .09 .04 .05 .00 −.04 .12** .10* .10* .08 −.31**
12. Long-term mating orientation .11* −.12** −.08 .02 −.01 −.05 −.15** .04 .04 −.06 −.36**
13. General trusta .17** −.22** −.23** −.07 −.06 .17** −.24** −.22** −.27** −.20** −.02 .08

Note. N Study 1 = 314. N Study 2 = 505. Above the diagonal is the bivariate correlation for Study 1. Below the diagonal is the bivariate correlation for Study 2. LH = life history.

aVariable included in Study 2.

*p < .05. **p < .01.