Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 8;43(2 Suppl):18–36. doi: 10.1177/0271678X231154597

Table 4.

Behavioral test results in mice with prolonged hypoperfusion induced by bilateral carotid artery stenosis.

Behavioral test Mouse age at BCAS (month) Hypoperfusion duration Results Studies (reference number)
Y-maze 2–3 30 days Spatial working memory ↓ Hou, 2015 (98)
2–2.5 60 days Spatial working memory ↓ Han, 2019 (61)
2.5–3 14 and 28 days Working memory → at day 14, ↓ at day 28 Miyanohara, 2018 (76)
2.5 30 days Spatial working memory↓ Washida, 2010 (70)
2.5 28 days Spatial working memory ↓ Miyamoto, 2013 (72)Miyamoto, 2020 (99)
2.5 4 and 6 months Working memory ↓ (both timepoints) Khan, 2018 (78)
3 14 days Spatial working memory ↓ Dong, 2011 (100)
3 21 days Spatial working memory ↓ Dong, 2011 (100)
3–4 28 days Spatial working memory ↓ Koizumi, 2018 (79)Du, 2020 (83)
2 and 8 14 days Working memory of middle-aged BCAS mice↓ (compared to young BCAS mice) Miyamoto, 2013 (29)
8-arm radial maze 2.5–3 28 days Spatial working memory ↓Reference memory → Chen, 2017 (56)Chen, 2019 (101)
2.5–3 30 days Spatial working memory↓Reference memory → Shibata, 2007 (13)
2.5 30 days Spatial working memory ↓ Duan, 2009 (54)
< 3 6 months Spatial working memory ↓ Holland, 2015 (14)
3–4 2 months Spatial working memory ↓ Coltman, 2011 (25)
4 5 months Spatial working memory ↓ Nishio, 2010 (24)
4–5 3 months Spatial working memory ↓ Kitamura, 2017 (34)
Barnes maze 4 6 months Reference memory ↓ Nishio, 2010 (24)
Water maze 2 28 days cognitive function ↓ Park, 2019 (102)
2–2.5 14 days Spatial learning memory ↓ Yuan, 2017 (103)
2.5 42 days Spatial learning memory ↓ Iwanami, 2015 (104)
2.5 42 days Spatial learning memory ↓ Mogi, 2018 (105)
3 10-14days 24-28days Spatial learning memory ↓ exception on day 26–28 Ahn, 2016 (106)
< 3 6 months Spatial reference lerning and memory ↓ Holland, 2015 (14)
3–4 1 month Reference memory → Coltman, 2011 (25)
4–4.5 35 days Reference memory ↓ Miki, 2009 (23)
8 7 weeks Reference memory → Ohtomo, 2021 (52)
9–13 7 weeks Spatial learning memory ↓ Boehm-Strum, 2017 (37)
NORT 2 28 days Cognitive function (30 min retention) ↓ Takase, 2021 (107)
2–2.5 28 days Cognitive function (6 h retention) ↓ Temma, 2017 (108)
2–2.5 60 days Cognitive function (1 h retention) ↓ Han, 2019 (61)
2–3 28 days Recognition memory (6 h retention)↓ Khan, 2015 (109)Kakae, 2019 (110)
2.5–3 28 days Working memory (6 h retention) ↓ Miyanohara, 2018 (76)
2.5–3 28 days Cognitive function (1 h retention) → Lee, 2019 (81)
2.5–3 40 days Short-term (90 min) memory ↓Long-term (24 h) memory → Patel, 2017 (57)
3 5 weeks Cognitive function (1 day retention) ↓ Dominguez, 2018 (75)
3 90 days Working memory (15 min retention) ↓ Tsai, 2015 (111)
3–4 28 days Cognitive function (30 min retention) ↓ Koizumi, 2018 (79)
8 7 weeks Cognitive function (30 min retention) ↓ Ohtomo, 2021 (52)
  9–13 7 weeks Short-term (2 h) memory → Boehm-Strum, 2017 (37)