Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 10;2013(9):CD008642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008642.pub2

Comparison 1. CHM versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Total effectiveness rate (number of participants recovered and significantly improved) 2 85 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.09 [1.32, 3.32]
2 Itching VAS 2 94 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.53 [‐2.64, ‐0.41]
3 Overall severity score 4 239 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.88 [‐1.67, ‐0.09]
4 Overall severity score (short‐term improvement) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 QoL 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 QoL (short‐term improvement) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Adverse events 2 129 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.06, 8.67]
8 Adverse events in one study 1   Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected