Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 29;2014(1):CD003987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003987.pub5

Wiegratz 2002.

Methods Two sites in Germany.
 Six treatment cycles.
Participants Women age 18 to 35 years with regular menses.
 Excluded contraindications for oral contraceptive use; recent hormonal drugs.
Interventions Dienogest 2 mg and EE 30 µg versus dienogest 2 mg and EE 20 µg versus dienogest 2 mg, estradiol valerate 2 mg and EE 10 µg versus levonorgestrel 100 µg and EE 20 µg.
 100 women randomized; initial number assigned to each study group not reported.
Outcomes Lipid metabolism.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "Double‐blinded" but did not report who was blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 110 women screened and 100 randomized.
 Eight women discontinued early. Primary reasons for discontinuation not described.
 One woman lost to follow up.
 Intent‐to treat analysis used.