Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 31;11:100536. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100536

Table 1.

Clinical evidence for DTAS in selected mothership patients.

Author,
year
Type
(R/NR)
Number of patients
Inclusion criteria DTG (min)
90-day mRS 0–2
Door to reperfusion
Mimics
DTAS (%)
DTAS Control DTAS Control DTAS Control DTAS Control
Psychogios et al., 2017¥[34] Prospective (NR) 21 33 1) First 5 h from known symptom onset
2) NIHSS ≥ 10
3) Patients were excluded if the angio suite was not available
4) Low-ASPECT, not a contraindication
25 59 N.A N.A 62 106 16%
Requena et al., 2020¥[35] Retrospective (CC) 50 175 1) First 6 h from known symptom onset
2) RACE scale ≥ 4
3) NIHSS > 10
4) Angio suite available
16 70 29% 43% 65 113 32%
Pfaff et al., 2020°, ¥[36] Prospective (R) 26 34 1) NIHSS> 7
2) pre-stroke mRS ≤ 3
3) Angiosuite available
41 40 61.5% 76.5% 80 78 13%
Requena et al., 2021¥[37] Prospective (R) 21 22 1) First 6 h from known symptom onset
2) RACE scale > 4
3) NIHSS > 10
4) pre-stroke mRS ≤ 2
5) Angio suite available
18 42 43.6% 28.8% 57 84 16.9%

¥ Heterogenous group of patients, including transfer patients, case number in the DTAS, and % of mimics refer to mothership patients only.

° mRS outcomes reported for 0–3 at 90-days.

NR: non-randomized; R: randomized, CC: case-control; DTAS: direct-to–angio suite; DTG: door-to-groin; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; mRS: modified Rankin Scale;