Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 31;26(11):2366–2373. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001532

Table 3.

Frequency (%) and relative risk (RR) of 15-month BMI gain (≥5 %) according to quintiles (Q) of baseline Nova diet quality scores. Participants of the NutriNet-Brasil cohort study (2020–2022) (n 9551)

NOVA diet quality scores BMI gain (%) Crude 95 % CI RR RR
Adjusted 95 % CI Adjusted§ 95 % CI
NOVA-WPF score*
Q1 21·59 1·00 1·00 1·00
Q2 18·16 0·84 0·74, 0·96 0·89 0·78, 1·01 0·91 0·80, 1·04
Q3 15·67 0·73 0·64, 0·83 0·79 0·69, 0·90 0·82 0·72, 0·93
Q4 15·16 0·70 0·61, 0·81 0·80 0·69, 0·92 0·84 0·73, 0·98
Q5 13·46 0·62 0·54, 0·72 0·74 0·64, 0·86 0·80 0·69, 0·94
P-value for linear trend < 0·001 < 0·001 < 0·01
NOVA-UPF score
Q1 13·28 1·00 1·00 1·00
Q2 14·96 1·13 0·97, 1·31 1·08 0·93, 1·26 1·07 0·92, 1·25
Q3 17·03 1·28 1·10, 1·49 1·22 1·04, 1·41 1·18 1·02, 1·38
Q4 18·25 1·37 1·19, 1·59 1·28 1·11, 1·48 1·23 1·06, 1·43
Q5 20·68 1·56 1·35, 1·79 1·41 1·22, 1·63 1·34 1·15, 1·56
P-value for linear trend < 0·001 < 0·001 < 0·001

WPF, whole plant food; UPF, ultra-processed food.

*

Nova-WPF score (min.–max.): Q1 (0·0–3·3); Q2 (3·7–4·7); Q3 (5·0–6·3); Q4 (6·7–8·0); Q5 (8·3–22·0).

Nova-UPF score (min.–max.): Q1 (0·0–0·7); Q2 (1·0–1·3); Q3 (1·7–2·0); Q4 (2·3–3·0); Q5 (3·3–13·7).

Adjusted for sex, age (continuous), macro-region of residence, educational level, smoking status, physical activity, diet for weight loss and BMI at baseline (continuous).

§

Additionally adjusted for quintiles of the other dietary score.